Skip to main content

Full text of "Major Federal legislation affecting social welfare, 1961-1965"

See other formats


\         / 

-b- 

.NP*KR7R.)^l^ 

cfi 

s^Ti 

^^^ 

^^^P^ 

**sLii\i\^W^- -    "^^^^^l«^^^^^^'^^^Sr 

-^^^^^^^^ 

Given  By 

f 

^T   S  STTPT  OFDOnTTMENTS 

°r 

5*3^-'^'"  ' 


Major  Federal 
Legislation  Affecting 
Social  Welfare 
-  -.  1961-1965 

Boston  Public  Lihmrv 


Public  Library 
Superintendent  of  Documents 

JUN  8-1965 
DEPOSITORY 


,     ^- 


U.S.  DEPARTMENT  OF  HEALTH,  EDUCATION,  AND  WELFARE  •  Welfare  Administration 


MAJOR  FEDERAL  LEGISLATION  AFFECTING  SOCIAL  WELFARE 

1961  -  1965 


This  publication  contains  reference  material  relating 
to  "Social  Change  through  Social  Welfare  and  the  Law," 
theme  of  the  1965  Forum  of  the  National  Conference  of 
Social  Welfare. 


U.  S.  DEPARTMENT  OF  HEALTH,  EDUCATION,  AND  WELFARE 
n  ';_  Welfare  Administration 


^a^^uA^tcA         l'^(p^ 


f?^' 


-^  /a 


.  5' 


TABLE  OF  CONTENTS 

Page 
Summary  List  of  Federal  Legislation 1 

Juvenile  Delinquency  and  Youth  Offenses  Control  Act 

of  1961  —  P.L.  87-274 4 

I 

Manpower  Development  and  Training  Act  of  1962  — 

P.L.  87-415 4 

Public  Welfare  Amendments  of  1962  —  P.L.  87-543 5 

Maternal  and  Child  Health  and  Mental  Retardation 

Planning  Amendments  of  1963  --  P.L.  88-156 15 

Mental  Retardation  Facilities  and  Community  Mental 

Health  Centers  Construction  Act  of  1963  —  P.L.  88-164 16 

Vocational  Education  Act  of  1963  —  P.L.  88-210 18 

Manpower  Development  and  Training  Act  Amendments 

of  1963  —  P.L.  88-214 21 

Civil  Rights  Act  of  1964  —  P.L.  88-352 22 

Juvenile  Delinquency  and  Youth  Offenses 

Control  Act  Extension  —  P.L.  88-368 30 

The  Economic  Opportunity  Act  of  1964  --  P.L.  88-452 31 

Foster  Care  for  Dependent  Children  --  P.L.  88-641 36 

OASDI,  and  Other  Amendments  to  the  Social  Security  Act 

and  the  Internal  Revenue  Code  of  1954  --  P.L.  88-650 37 

Appalachian  Regional  Development  Act  of  1965  --  P.L.  89-4 38 

Elementary  and  Secondary  Education  Act  of  1965  —  P.L.  89-10  ...    39 

Social  Security  Amendments  of  1965  —  H.R.  6675 40 


MAJOR  FEDERAL  LEGISLATION  AFFECTING  SOCIAL  WELFARE 

1961  -  1965 


The  four  years  from  1961  to  1965  have  seen  major  advances  in  Federal 
support  for  programs  of  interest  and  importance  to  the  social  welfare 
conmunity.  The  mere  listing  of  acts  affecting  the  Department  of  Health, 
Education,  and  Welfare  indicates  the  wide  variety  of  new  and  expanded 
Federal  or  Federally  supported  activities  which  have  been  undertaken  since 
1961.  These  acts  include: 


Health 


P.L.  87-781 
P.L.  87-88 

P.L.  87-838 

P.L.  87-395 

P.L.  87-262 

P.L.  87-692 

P.L.  87-761 

P.L.  87-868 

P.L.  88-129 

P.L.  88-156 

PoL.  88-164 

P.L.  88-206 
P.L.  88-424 

P.L.  88-443 

P.L.  88-497 

P.L.  88-581 
P.L.  88-379 
P.L.  88-597 

P.L.  88-625 
P.L.  88-654 


Drug  Amendments  of  1962 

Federal  Water  Pollution  Control  Act 

of  1961 
National  Institute  of  Child  Health 

and  Human  Development 
Community  Health  Services  and  Facilities 

Act  of  1961 
Transfer  of  Freedmen's  Hospital  to 

Howard  University 
Health  Clinics  for  Migratory  Workers 
Air  Pollution  Act 
Vaccination  Assistance  Act  of  1962 
Health  Professions  Educational  Assistance 

Act 
Maternal  and  Child  Health  and  Mental 

Retardation  Planning  Amendments  of  1963 
Mental  Retardation  Facilities  and  Conmunity 

Mental  Health  Construction  Act  of  1963 
Clean  Air  Act 
Medical  Care  for  Self-Employed  Commercial 

Fishermen 
Hospital  and  Medical  Facilities  Amendments 

of  1964 
Graduate  Public  Health  Training  Amendments 

of  1964 
Nurse  Training  Act  of  1964 
Water  Resources  Research  Act  of  1964 
District  of  Columbia  Hospitalization  of 

the  Mentally  111  Act 
Food  Additives  Extension 
Loans  to  Students  of  Optometry 


Education 


P.L.  87-415 


P.L. 

87-22 

P.L. 

87-276 

P.L. 

87-715 

P.L. 

87-294 

P.L. 

87-344 

P.L. 

87-835 

P.L. 

87-447 

P.L. 

87-786 

P.L. 

88-204 

P.L. 

88-210 

P.L. 

88-214 

P.L. 

88-269 

P.L. 

88-665 

Welfare 

P.L. 

87-31 

P.L. 

87-543 

P.L. 

87-64 

P.L. 

87-274 

P.L. 

87-510 

P.L. 

87-301 

P.L. 

88-48 

P.L. 

88-150 

P.L. 

88-368 

P.L. 

88-641 

P.L. 

88-650 

P.L. 

88-345 

P.L. 

88-347 

P.L. 

88-353 

P.L. 

88-382 

Manpower  Development  and  Training  Act 

of  1962 
Vocational  Education  for  Practical  Nurse 

Training 
Training  of  Teachers  of  the  Deaf 
Captioned  Films  for  the  Deaf 
American  Printing  House  for  the  Blind 
Extension  of  National  Defense  Education 

Act  and  Impacted  Area  Program 
Repeal  of  Disclaimer  Affidavit  in  NDEA 
Educational  Television 
Surplus  Property  for  Special  Education  Schools, 

Educational  Television  and  Radio  Stations, 

and  Public  Libraries 
Higher  Education  Facilities  Act  of  1963 
Vocational  Education  Act  of  1963 
Manpower  Development  and  Training  Amend- 
ments of  1963 
Library  Services  and  Construction  Act 
National  Defense  Education  Act  Amendments 

of  1964 


Public  Assistance  Amendments  of  1961 

(Aid  to  Dependent  Children  of  Unemployed 

Parents) 
Public  Welfare  Amendments  of  1962 
Scclal  Security  Amendments  of  1961 
Juvenile  Delinquency  and  Youth  Offenses 

Control  Act  of  1961 
Migration  and  Refugee  Assistance  Act 

(Cuban  Refugee  Program) 
Alien  Orphan  Legislation 
AFDC  Foster  Care  Administrative  Extension 
Federal  Credit  Union  Amendments 
Juvenile  Delinquency  and  Youth  Offenses 

Control  Act  Extension 
Foster  Care  for  Dependent  Children 
OASDI,  and  Other  Amendments  to  the  Social 

Security  Act 
Extension  of  AFDC  Foster  Care 
Extension  of  Temporary  Assistance  to 

Repatriated  Citizens 
Federal  Credit  Union  Act  Amendments 
Nevada  Social  Security  System 


-  2  - 


Related  Legislation 

P.L.  87-27  Area  Redevelopment  Act 

P.L.  88-352  Civil  Rights  Act  of  1964 

P.L.  88-452  Economic  Opportunity  Act  of  1964 

Malor  Legislation.  January-April  1965 

P.L.  89-4  Appalachia  Development 

P.L.  89-10  Elementary  and  Secondary  Education 

Act  of  1965 
H.R.  6675  Social  Security  Amendments  of  1965 

Some  of  these  Acts  have  passing  interest  for  the  social  welfare  com- 
munity; others  are  of  vital  interest.  The  purpose  of  this  paper  is  to 
summarize  those  Federal  laws  which  have  substantial  and  significant  import. 
Those  selected  for  summarization  are: 

1.  Juvenile  Delinquency  and  Youth  Offenses  Control  Act  of 

1961  —  P.L.  87-274. 

2.  Manpower  Development  and  Training  Act  of  1962  --  P.L.  87-415. 

3.  Public  Welfare  Amendments  of  1962  --  P.L.  87-543. 

4.  Maternal  and  Child  Health  and  Mental  Retardation  Planning 

Amendments  of  1963  —  P.L.  88-156. 

5.  Mental  Retardation  Facilities  and  Community  Mental  Health 

Construction  Act  of  1963  --  P.L.  88-164. 

6.  Vocational  Education  Act  of  1963  --  P.L.  88-210. 

7.  Manpower  Development  and  Training  Amendments  of  1963  --  P.L.  88-214. 

8.  Civil  Rights  Act  of  1964  —  P.L.  88-352. 

9.  Juvenile  Delinquency  and  Youth  Offenses  Control  Act  Extension  -- 

P.L.  88-368. 

10.  Economic  Opportunity  Act  of  1964  —  P.L.  88-452. 

H.  Foster  Care  for  Dependent  Children  --  P.L.  88-641. 

12.  OASDI,  and  Other  Amendments  to  the  Social  Security  Act  — 
P.L.  88-650. 


-  3 


1.  Juvenile  Delinquency  and  Youth  Offenses  Control  Act  of  1961  —  P.L.  87-274, 

On  September  22,  1961,  President  Kennedy  signed  the  Juvenile  Delinquency 
and  Youth  Offenses  Control  Act.   This  legislation,  the  first  major  attempt 
by  the  Federal  Government  to  support  developmental  activity  in  the  field  of 
juvenile  delinquency  prevention  and  control,  was  aimed  at  assisting  in  the 
development  of  techniques  for  the  prevention  and  control  of  juvenile  delin- 
quency and  youth  offenses.   It  also  had  as  its  purpose  the  encouragement  of 
coordination  of  governmental  and  nongovernmental  educational,  employment, 
health,  welfare,  law  enforcement,  correctional,  and  other  agency  efforts 
concerned  with  these  problems. 

Major  provisions  of  the  law 

Demonstration  projects;   The  Secretary  of  Health,  Education,  and 
Welfare  is  authorized  to  make  grants  to  governmental  or  nonprofit  agencies, 
organizations,  or  institutions  for  the  demonstration  or  evaluation  of 
effectiveness  of  improved  methods  for  the  prevention  and  control  of  juvenile 
delinquency  and  youth  offenses. 

Training  of  personnel;   Grants  were  authorized  for  the  training  of 
persons  employed  or  preparing  for  employment  in  programs  for  the  prevention 
or  control  of  juvenile  delinquency  or  youth  offenses.   Such  training  programs 
may  Include  the  development  of  courses  of  study  and  the  establishment  of 
short-term  traineeships,  among  other  things. 

Technical  assistance;   The  Secretary  of  Health,  Education,  and 
Welfare  Is  authorized  to  make  studies  related  to  the  prevention  and  control 
of  juvenile  delinquency  and  to  render  assistance  to  governmental  and  non- 
governmental agencies  in  these  matters,  and  to  disseminate  materials  in 
these  areas. 

Appropriations;   For  carrying  out  the  Act,  an  appropriation  of 
$10  million  was  authorized  for  fiscal  year  1962  and  the  two  succeeding  years. 

2.  Manpower  Development  and  Training  Act  of  1962  —  P.L,  87-415 

On  March  15,  1962,  President  Kennedy  signed  into  law  the  Manpower  Develop- 
ment and  Training  Act  of  1962.   This  Act  authorized  a  3-year  $435  million 
nationwide  program  to  train  the  unemployed  and  upgrade  the  skills  of  the 
underemployed.   Its  basic  objective  was  to  reduce  hard-core  imemployment  by 
enabling  workers  whose  skills  have  become  obsolete  to  receive  training  which 
will  qualify  them  to  obtain  and  hold  full-time  jobs.   It  also  authorizes 
research  in  problems  of  manpower. 

Major  provisions  of  the  legislation 

Training  and  Skill  Development  Programs;   The  Act  provides  that  the 
Secretary  of  Labor  shall  be  responsible  for  identlflcatien  of  occupational 

-  4  - 


training  needs,  selection  of  trainees  through  a  program  of  testing  and 
counselling,  and  placement  of  persons  who  are  trained.  Before  selecting  a 
person  for  training,  it  must  be  determined  that  there  is  a  reasonable  expec- 
tation of  employment  in  the  occupation  for  which  the  person  is  trained. 
The  Secretary  of  Labor  is  also  responsible  for  administering,  through  agree- 
ments with  States,  a  program  of  weekly  training  allowances  for  tmemployed 
persons  undergoing  training.  These  allowances  were  limited  to  52  weeks. 
Unemployed  persons  who  had  had  at  least  three  years  experience  in  gainful 
employment  and  were  either  heads  of  families  or  heads  of  households  were 
eligible  for  regular  training  allowances.   Special  allowances  were  provided 
for  youths  over  nineteen  but  under  twenty-two  years  of  age. 

The  Secretary  of  Labor  was  also  responsible  for  encouraging, 
developing,  and  securing  the  adoption  of  programs  for  on-the-job  training. 

The  Secretary  of  Health,  Education,  and  Welfare  was  authorized  to 
enter  into  agreements  with  States  under  which  the  appropriate  State  voca- 
tional education  agencies  will  provide  the  training  needed  to  equip  persons 
referred  by  the  Department  of  Labor.   State  agencies  shall  provide  the 
vocational  training  through  public  education  agencies  or  institutions  or 
where  these  are  inadequate  through  arrangements  with  private  educational 
institutions.   The  Secretary  of  Health,  Education,  and  Welfare  may  also  con- 
tract directly  with  public  or  private  educational  institutions  when  a  State 
has  not  entered  into  an  agreement  or  when  a  State  does  not  provide  certain 
training  under  an  agreement. 

Evaluation.  Information,  and  Research;   The  Secretary  of  Labor  is 
required  to  evaluate  the  impact  of  automation  and  technological  progress  on 
human  resources,  factors  affecting  the  mobility  of  workers,  and  future  man- 
power needs.  He  is  to  promote  programs  of  information  about  manpower 
requirements,  development,  and  utilization,  and  shall  report  to  the  President, 
and  the  President  to  the  Congress  on  these  areas  and  on  training. 

Authorizations:   The  Act  authorized  $100  million  for  fiscal  year 
1963,  and  $165  million  for  the  succeeding  two  years  for  carrying  out  the 
programs.  Training  costs  and  training  allowances  were  to  be  met  fully  from 
Federal  funds  through  fiscal  year  1964.  In  fiscal  year  1965  the  financing 
was  to  be  on  a  50-50  Federal-State  matching  basis.  Criteria  were  established 
for  the  apportionment  of  funds  among  the  States. 

3.  Public  Welfare  Amendments  of  1962  —  P.L.  87-543. 

The  Public  Welfare  Amendments  of  1962,  signed  by  President  Kennedy  on 
July  25,  1962,  are  among  the  most  Important  changes  in  the  Social  Security 
Act  in  that  Act's  history.  The  amendments  emphasize  rehabilitation, 
services,  and  the  training  of  staff,  liberalize  payments,  and  provide  States 
with  significant  tools  for  making  public  welfare  programs  more  effective. 


On  signing  the  Act,  President  Kennedy  said, 

"This  measure  embodies  a  new  approach-- stressing  services  in  addition 
to  support,  rehabilitation  instead  of  relief,  and  training  for  useful  work 
instead  of  prolonged  dependency.   This  important  legislation  will  assist 
our  states  and  local  public  welfare  agencies  to  redirect  the  incentives  and 
services  they  offer  to  needy  families  and  children  and  to  aged  and  disabled 
people.  Our  objective  is  to  prevent  or  reduce  dependency  and  to  encourage 
self-care  and  self-support--to  maintain  family  life  where  it  is  adequate  and 
to  restore  it  where  it  is  deficient." 

Major  provisions  of  the  legislation 

Improvement  in  Services 

Rehabilitative  Setvices  and  Training;   The  new  law  places  increased 
emphasis  on  encouraging  the  States  to  furnish  rehabilitative  and  other  social 
services  to  the  needy  aged,  blind,  and  disabled,  and  dependent  children.   The 
services  are  directed  to  help  the  aged  to  attain  or  retain  capacity  for  self- 
care,  the  needy  blind  and  disabled  to  achieve  self-support  or  self-care,  and 
dependent  families  and  children  to  strengthen  their  family  life.   Under  the 
program  of  aid  to  families  with  dependent  children,  services  for  relatives 
caring  for  children  are  directed  toward  maximum  self-support  and  personal 
independence  consistent  with  the  maintenance  of  continuing  care  and  protec- 
tion for  the  dependent  children.   The  legislation  also  provides  specific 
authority  for  Federal  participation  in  the  cost  of  providing  social  services 
to  applicants  for  and  recipients  of  medical  assistance  for  the  aged. 

Additional  Federal  financial  participation  is  made  available  in  the 
cost  of  providing  those  self-care  and  self-support  services  which  the  Secre- 
tary prescribes,  other  services  specified  as  likely  to  prevent  or  reduce  de- 
pendency, and  for  the  cost  of  training  staff  to  administer  public  assistance 
programs.   Effective  September  1,  1962,  the  Federal  share  is  75  percent  of 
the  cost  of  providing  those  social  services  which  the  Secretary  has  pre- 
scribed or  specified  and  for  training.   The  Federal  share  of  the  cost  of 
providing  other  social  services  and  other  costs  of  administration  remains  at 
50  percent.  As  of  July  1,  1963,  the  full  Federal  share  of  75  percent  of 
expenditures  for  services  and  training  would  be  available  only  to  those 
States  that  offered  the  minimum  group  of  the  services  the  Secretary  has  pre- 
scribed. 

The  public  welfare  agency  will  continue  to  provide  services  by  the 
use  of  its  own  staff  as  under  former  law.   The  new  law  provides  that,  sub- 
ject to  limitations  prescribed  by  the  Secretary,  where  a  State  welfare 
agency  determines  that  it  or  the  local  agency  cannot  offer  necessary  services 
economically  or  effectively,  and  that  these  services  are  not  otherwise 


-  6  - 


reasonably  available,  they  may  be  purchased  by  agreement  from  other  State 
agencies.  With  respect  to  vocational  rehabilitation  services  (as  defined 
by  the  Vocational  Rehabilitation  Act)  when  those  are  available  through  the 
vocational  rehabilitation  agency  or  when  the  vocational  rehabilitation 
agency  is  able  and  willing  to  provide  them  pursuant  to  agreement,  such 
services  may  not  be  provided  by  the  State  or  local  public  assistance  agency 
with  Federal  financial  participation  nor  through  arrangement  with  any  other 
State  agency. 

Under  prior  law,  the  Federal  government  could  participate  in  the 
cost  of  providing  social  services  only  to  applicants  for  and  recipients  of 
public  assistance.  The  new  legislation  offers  Federal  financial  participa- 
tion in  the  cost  of  providing  services  also  to  former  applicants  and 
recipients  and  persons  likely  to  become  applicants  or  recipients,  on  request 
of  such  persons;  in  both  these  instances  under  limitations  specified  by  the 
Secretary. 

Demonstration  Projects;   In  order  to  encourage  States  to  develop 
new  ideas  and  new  approaches  to  the  problems  recipients  bring  to  the  public 
welfare  agencies,  the  amended  law  would  encourage  the  States  to  experiment 
in  new  methods  of  providing  assistance  and  social  services.   The  Secretary 
is  authorized  to  waive  plan  requirements  for  demonstration  projects  under- 
taken by  the  States  which  are  designed  to  carry  out  the  purposes  of  the 
program.   For  instance,  the  demonstration  projects  would  not  have  to  be  on 
a  State-wide  basis.   The  legislation  also  authorizes  up  to  $2  million  per 
year  of  Federal  funds  appropriated  for  public  assistance  to  be  used  to 
assist  in  paying  that  portion  of  the  cost  not  already  subject  to  Federal 
participation. 

Child  Welfare  Provisions 

Increase  in  Authorization  of  Appropriations  for  Child  Welfare 
Services;   Under  the  previous  law  (part  3  of  title  V  of  the  Social 
Security  Act),  $25,000,000  per  year  was  authorized  to  be  appropriated  for 
grants  to  the  States  for  child  welfare  services.   The  new  law  increases 
the  authorization  to  $30,000,000  for  fiscal  1963,  $35,000,000  for  fiscal 
1964,  $40,000,000  each  for  fiscal  1965  and  1966,  $45,000,000  each  for 
fiscal  1967  and  1968,  and  $50,000,000  per  year  thereafter. 

Child  Welfare  State  Plan  Provisions;   Part  3  of  title  V  of  the 
Social  Security  Act  provides  for  grants  to  States  for  the  use  of  cooper- 
ating State  public  welfare  agencies  in  carrying  out  the  State  plan 
developed  jointly  by  the  State  agency  and  the  Secretary.   The  new  law  adds 
the  following  requirements,  effective  July  1,  1963: 

1.   Inclusion  in  the  plan  of  provision  for  coordination  between 
the  services  provided  under  it  and  those  which  are  provided  for  children 
under  the  State  plan  relating  to  dependent  children  which  is  approved 
under  title  IV  of  the  Act. 


2.  A  showing  by  the  State  that  it  is  extending  child  welfare 
services  in  the  State  with  a  view  to  making  them  available  throughout  the 
State  to  all  children  in  need  of  them  by  July  1,  1975;  the  services  are 
to  be  provided  by  the  staff  of  the  State  or  local  public  welfare  agency 
who  would,  to  the  extent  feasible,  be  trained  child-welfare  personnel; 

in  providing  for  this  extension  of  services  priority  is  to  be  given  to  com- 
munities with  the  greatest  need  for  them,  after  considering  their  relative 
financial  need. 

3.  Inclusion  in  the  plan,  if  it  provides  for  day  care,  of  pro- 
vision for: 

Cooperative  arrangements  with  the  State  health  and  educa- 
tion agencies  to  assure  maximum  utilization  of  them  in  the 
provision  of  health  services  and  education  for  children 
receiving  such  day  care; 

An  advisory  committee,  to  advise  the  State  public  welfare 
agency  on  the  general  policy  involved  in  the  provision  of  day 
care  under  the  State  plan,  which  shall  include  among  its 
members  representatives  of  other  State  agencies  concerned 
with  day  care  or  services  related  thereto  and  persons  repre- 
sentative of  professional  or  civic  or  other  public  or  non- 
profit private  agencies,  organizations  or  groups  concerned 
with  the  provision  of  day  care; 

Such  safeguards  as  may  be  necessary  to  assure  provision 
of  day  care  under  the  plan  only  in  cases  in  which  it  is  in 
the  best  interest  of  the  child  and  the  mother  and  only  in 
cases  in  which  it  is  determined,  under  criteria  established 
by  the  State,  that  a  need  for  such  care  exists,  and  in  the 
cases  in  which  the  family  is  able  to  pay  part  or  all  of  the 
costs  of  such  care,  for  pajroent  of  such  fees  as  may  be  reason- 
able in  the  light  of  such  ability;  and 

Giving  priority,  in  determining  the  existence  of  need  for  such 
day  care,  to  members  of  low-income  or  other  groups  in  the  popu- 
lation and  to  geographical  areas  which  have  the  greatest 
relative  need  for  extension  of  such  day  care. 

Day  Care;   Under  the  new  law,  up  to  $5,000,000  of  Federal  child 
welfare  funds  could  be  earmarked  for  day  care  for  the  fiscal  year  1963,  and 
up  to  $10,000,000  for  fiscal  1964  and  each  year  thereafter.  These  earmarked 
funds  are  to  be  allotted  among  all  States  in  relation  to  the  State's  child 
population  and  per  capita  income,  except  that  no  State  would  receive  less 
than  $10,000  for  day  care  services.  The  States  are  required  to  match  these 
ftmds  with  funds  spent  for  child  welfare  services  under  the  State  child  wel- 
fare plan. 


8  - 


Definition  of  Child  Welfare  Services;  The  purposes  for  which  grants 
to  the  States,  under  part  3  of  title  V,  may  be  used  is  clarified  and  somewhat 
broadened  through  the  addition  of  a  definition  of  child-welfare  services. 

Training  of  Child  Welfare  Personnel;   The  previous  law  (sec.  526(a) 
of  the  Social  Security  Act) ,  which  authorized  grants  for  research  and  danon- 
strations  in  the  field  of  child  welfare,  is  amended  so  as  to  add  authoriza- 
tion for  grants  for  special  projects  for  training  personnel  in  the  field  of 
child  welfare.  These  special  projects  could  also  Include  traineeships. 

Incentives  to  Public  Assistance  Recipients 

Each  of  the  public  assistance  titles  of  the  Social  Security  Act 
has  been  so  amended  as  to  require  States  in  determining  need  to  take  into 
consideration  expenses  reasonably  attributable  to  the  earning  of  income. 

In  addition,  title  I  has  been  so  amended  as  to  permit  the  States 
in  determining  need  for  old-age  assistance  to  disregard  the  first  $10  of 
earned  income  plus  one-half  the  remainder  of  the  first  $30.   This  becomes 
effective  January  1,  1963. 

This  new  law  also  gives  the  States  the  option  in  their  aid  to 
dependent  children  programs  under  title  IV  to  permit  income  to  be  set  aside 
for  the  future  identifiable  needs  of  children  receiving  aid,  subject  to 
limitations  prescribed  by  the  Secretary. 

The  law  also  amends  title  X  to  prescribe  an  additional  exemption 
of  income  and  resources  in  aid  to  the  blind,  effective  July  1,  1963,  to 
individuals  who  are  under  a  plan  for  achieving  self-support  by  providing 
that  for  a  period  not  in  excess  of  12  months,  any  additional  amounts  of 
income  and  resources  necessary  for  the  fulfillment  of  the  plan  shall  be 
disregarded.   Present  law  provides  only  for  disregarding  the  first  $85  of 
earned  income  plus  one-half  of  earned  income  in  excess  of  $85 . 

Increase  in  Federal  Matching  Formula  for  the  Aged.  Blind  and  Disabled^ 
and  Federal  Share  of  Assistance  to  Both  Parents  of  Dependent  Children 

The  Congress  previously  voted  to  change,  for  a  temporary  period,  the 
matching  foimula  determining  the  Federal  share  of  assistance  expenditures  to 
enable  the  States  to  Increase  payments  to  the  needy  aged,  blind,  and  disabled 
by  $1  a  month. 

The  legislation  became  effective  October  1,  1961,  and  expired  June  30, 
1962.  The  new  law  would  extend  this  $1  increase  in  the  formula,  and  effective 
October  1,  1962, the  Federal  share  would  also  be  increased  by  about  an  addi- 
tional $4.  Under  the  new  legislation  States  will  receive  Federal  funds  to 
enable  them  to  increase  assistance  payments  to  the  needy  aged,  blind,  and 


disabled  by  $4  per  month.   The  formula  change  Is  accomplished  by  increasing 
the  Federal  share  from  4/5  of  the  first  $30  of  the  average  assistance  pay- 
ment to  29/35  of  the  first  $35  of  the  average  monthly  assistance  payment. 
The  maximum  average  amount  subject  to  Federal  participation  is  increased 
from  $66  to  $70  a  month.   The  additional  $15  in  old-age  assistance  for 
medical  payments  continues  and  therefore  the  total  maximum  in  old-age 
assistance  is  $85  a  month. 

The  House  Ways  and  Means  Committee,  Senate  Finance  Committee  and 
the  Conference  Committee  of  the  two  houses  made  clear  that  they  expected  and, 
on  the  basis  of  past  experience  with  similar  increases,  believed  that  the 
additional  Federal  funds  would  be  used  to  improve  payments  to  aged,  blind, 
and  disabled  recipients. 

To  reflect  these  increases  in  Federal  matching,  the  annual  dollar 
limitation  on  public  assistance  payments  for  Puerto  Rico  is  increased  from 
$9,500,000  to  $9,800,000;  for  the  Virgin  Islands  from  $320,000  to  $330,000; 
and  for  Guam  from  $430,000  to  $450,000. 

Under  previous  provisions  of  law,  the  Federal  Government  could 
recognize  for  financial  participation  in  State  expenditures  for  aid  to 
dependent  children  the  needs  of  only  one  parent  or  other  relative  caring 
for  the  dependent  child.  Under  the  new  law,  effective  October  1,  1962, 
both  parents  may  be  counted  for  Federal  financial  participation  when  both 
are  living  in  the  home  with  children  deprived  of  parental  care  and  support 
because  of  the  incapacity  or  unemployment  of  a  parent. 

The  ADC  Program 

Change  in  Name;   Effective  upon  enactment,  the  new  law  made  a 
number  of  changes  in  title  IV  of  the  Social  Security  Act  which  provides  for 
grants  to  the  States  for  aid  to  dependent  children.   The  name  of  the  program 
is  changed  to  "Grants  to  the  States  for  Aid  and  Services  to  Needy  Families 
with  Children."  This  change  reflects  the  new  emphasis  on  providing  social 
services  to  families. 

Aid  to  Children  of  Unemployed  Parent;   The  temporary  legislation 
enacted  in  1961  authorizing  Federal  financial  participation  for  14  months 
in  assistance  to  children  in  need,  and  deprived  of  parental  care  and  support 
because  of  the  unemployment  of  a  parent,  has  been  extended  to  June  30,  1967. 
A  provision  was  added  for  the  denial  of  assistance  if  and  for  as  long  as 
the  ttnemployed  parent  refuses  to  accept  retraining  without  good  cause. 

Community  Work  and  Training  Programs;  The  new  legislation  makes 
it  possible  for  the  Federal  Government  to  participate  in  certain  costs  of 
commxmity  work  and  training  programs  of  a  constructive  nature  designed  to 


-  10 


conserve  and  develop  work  skills.  Prior  to  this,  the  Federal  Government 
could  participate  only  in  money  pa3mients  with  respect  to  a  needy  child 
as  well  as  medical  care  in  his  behalf.  The  provision  authorizes  Federal 
financial  participation  in  payments  for  work  petformed  by  recipients  of 
aid  to  needy  families  with  children  who  are  over  18  years  of  age.  There 
is  no  Federal  sharing  in  the  cost  of  materials,  equipment,  or  job  super- 
vision. The  work  must  be  performed  for  a  State  agency  or  any  other  public 
agency  under  a  program  (which  need  not  be  in  effect  throughout  all  parts 
of  the  State)  administered  by  or  under  the  supervision  of  the  State  agency 
and  there  must  be  State  financial  participation  in  the  expenditures. 
Furthermore,  the  State  plan  must  include  the  following: 

(a)  Provisions  which  in  the  judgment  of  the  Secretary  provide 
reasonable  assurance  that  appropriate  standards  for  health,  safety,  and 
other  conditions  of  work  are  established  and  maintained;  that  payment  for 
work  will  be  no  lower  than  the  minimum  rate  established  by  State  law  and 
not  less  than  prevailing  community  rates  for  similar  work;  that  the  projects 
will  serve  a  useful  public  purpose  and  not  result  in  the  displacement  of 
regular  workers,  and  (except  in  the  case  of  emergency  work  or  that  of  a 
non-recurring  type)  have  not  normally  been  undertaken  by  the  State  or  com- 
munity; that  additional  expenses  reasonably  attributable  to  work  are  con- 
sidered in  determining  need;  that  the  worker  will  have  reasonable  opportu* 
nity  to  seek  regular  employment  and  receive  any  available  and  appropriate 
training  or  retraining;  that  work  performed  be  under  the  State's  workmen's 
compensation  law  or  comparable  protection;  and  aid  will  not  be  denied  for 
refusal  for  good  cause  to  perform  work. 

(b)  Provisions  for  entering  into  cooperative  arrangements  with 
the  State  public  employment  system  with  appropriate  provisions  for  regis- 
tration and  re-registration,  £md  that  maximum  utilization  is  made  of  its 
job  placement  services  and  facilities. 

(c)  Provisions  for  entering  into  cooperative  arrangements  with 
the  State  agency  administering  or  supervising  the  administration  of  voca- 
tional education  and  adult  education  to  encourage  training  and  re-training 
and  otherwise  assist  in  preparing  for  regular  employment. 

(d)  Provisions  to  assure  appropriate  arrangements  for  the  care 
and  protection  of  the  child  during  the  relative's  absence  at  work. 

(e)  Provision  that  there  be  no  adjustment  or  recovery  for  pay- 
ments correctly  made  for  work. 

A  number  of  States  have  had  work  programs  in  some  or  all  locali- 
ties for  years.  Upon  the  extension  of  aid  to  dependent  children  because 
of  imemployment  some  of  these  programs  have  been  redirected.  For  States 
that  made  payments  for  work  performed  by  the  ADC  parent  or  relative  and 
met  the  new  provisions  (with  certain  exceptions).  Federal  financial 


-  11  - 


participation  is  retroactive  to  July  1,  1961.  All  of  the  new  provisions  in 
the  law  Imposing  State  plan  requirements  pertinent  to  community  work  and 
training  programs  are  effective  after  October  1,  1962.  The  provisions 
expire  June  30,  1967.  Prior  to  Janxiary  1967,  the  Secretary  is  to  report 
the  experience  of  the  States  with  this  program  to  the  President  for  trans- 
mission to  the  Congress. 

Foster  Care  for  Certain  Children;   Effective  May  1,  1961,  title  IV 
was  amended  to  authorize  Federal  financial  participation  for  a  temporary 
period  expiring  June  30,  1962,  in  payments  for  the  foster  family  care  of 
children  receiving  aid  to  dependent  children.   For  those  children  who  are 
receiving  aid  to  dependent  children  but  are  without  proper  care  and  protec- 
tion in  their  own  homes,  the  agency  may  make  an  alternative  plan.  The 
Federal  Govenmient  shares  in  the  States'  payments  for  foster  care  as  a  proper 
aid  to  dependent  children  expenditure  where  certain  conditions  are  met. 
These  include  removal  of  the  child  from  his  home  as  a  result  of  a  judicial 
determination  that  conditions  are  contrary  to  his  welfare,  that  the  ADC 
agency  has  responsibility  for  his  placement  and  care  in  a  licensed  or  ap- 
proved foster  family  home  (with  exceptions  as  subsequently  indicated)  and 
that  the  child  otherwise  remains  eligible.  The  new  legislation  makes  this 
provision  permanent. 

In  addition,  the  new  law  provides  for  Federal  financial  participa- 
tion in  payments  for  foster  care  in  child-care  institutions  under  the  same 
conditions  as  prescribed  for  foster  family  care.   This  provision  is  effec- 
tive from  October  1,  1962  through  Septenber  30,  1964. 

Responsibility  for  Placement  and  Care:   In  some  States  children 
placed  in  foster  homes  following  a  judicial  determination  become  wards  of 
the  court  and  the  probation  department  of  the  court  arranges  for  placement 
and  care.   In  other  States  there  are  separate  agencies  administering  public 
assistance  and  child  welfare  and  legal  responsibility  for  foster  care  pro- 
grams is  with  the  agency  administering  child  welfare.   The  new  law  amends 
the  foster  care  provisions  of  title  IV  for  a  temporary  period  beginning 
October  1,  1962  until  June  30,  1963  to  permit  the  responsibility  for  a 
child  recipient  of  aid  to  dependent  children  in  foster  care  to  be  with 
another  public  agency  providing  there  is  in  effect  an  agreement  with  the 
ADC  agency  under  which  a  plan  for  each  child  will  be  made  and  other  objec- 
tives of  the  program  carried  out  in  a  manner  satisfactory  to  the  ADC  agency. 
By  March  31,  1963,  the  Secretary  is  to  submit  a  report  of  the  administration 
of  this  provision  with  recommendations  for  its  continuation  or  modification. 

Services  for  Each  Child;   Each  State  plan  must  provide  for  the 
development  and  application  of  a  program  for  welfare  services  for  each  child 
recipient  as  necessary  for  the  needs  of  such  child  as  well  as  the  coordina- 
tion of  such  programs  with  the  State's  child  welfare  services  plan  toward 
providing  the  services  that  will  best  promote  the  welfare  of  the  child  and 
his  family. 


-  12  - 


Authority  to  States  to  Prevent  Misuse  of  ADC  Payments:   When  the 
State  agency  has  reason  to  believe  that  payments  are  not  used  in  the  best 
interests  of  the  child,  counseling  and  guidance  may  be  provided  to  the 
relative  with  respect  to  the  use  of  such  payments.   The  State  agency  is 
also  authorized  upon  continued  failure  to  extend  the  payment  for  the  best 
interest  of  the  child,  to  advise  the  relative  that  continued  failure  will 
result  in  a  protective  payment  or  seeking  the  appointment  of  a  guardian  or 
legal  representative.   States  are  also  authorized,  after  so  advising  the 
relative,  to  take  action  for  the  imposition  of  criminal  or  civil  penalties 
by  a  court  of  competent  jurisdiction. 

Protective  Payments:   In  order  to  meet  the  problem  of  certain 
families  receiving  aid  to  dependent  children  where  the  assistance  payments 
are  not  being  spent  for  the  well-being  of  the  child,  the  new  law  permits 
protective  payments.  These  are  payments  which  would  be  recognized  as  money 
payments  except  that  they  were  made  to  an  individual  who  is  interested  in 
the  welfare  of  the  family  but  is  not  a  specified  relative  under  title  IV. 
The  State  plan  under  which  these  payments  are  made  must  provide  for: 

(1)  A  determination  by  the  State  agency  that  such  payments  are 
necessary  because  the  relative  with  whom  the  child  is  living  is  so  unable 
to  manage  funds  that  making  payments  to  him  is  contrary  to  the  welfare  of 
the  child; 

(2)  Making  such  payments  only  when  they  (together  with  other 
income  and  resources)  meet  all  needs  of  the  family  receiving  them,  accord- 
ing to  State  plan  standards  otherwise  applicable  for  determining  need  and 
amount  of  ADC; 

(3)  Undertaking  and  continuing  special  efforts  to  develop  the 
ability  to  manage  funds  on  the  part  of  the  relative; 

(4)  Periodic  review  of  the  situation  to  determine  the  need  for 
continuing  such  payments,  terminating  them  if  not  necessary,  and  seeking 
judicial  appointment  of  a  guardian  or  legal  representative  if  the  need  for 
such  payments  continues  beyond  a  period  specified  by  the  Secretary; 

(5)  Aid  in  the  form  of  foster  family  care;  and 

(6)  Opportunity  for  fair  hearing  on  the  determination  of  the  need 
for  a  protective  payment. 

The  number  of  individuals  for  whom  protective  payments  are  made  in 
any  month  who  may  be  counted  may  not  exceed  5  percent  of  other  recipients 
under  this  program  during  the  month. 

Operation  of  State  Plans  for  ADC;   The  provision  in  title  IV  added 
in  1961,  the  effect  of  which  is  to  confirm  that  aid  cannot  be  denied  a  child 


-  13  - 


because  of  conditions  in  his  home  while  the  child  continues  to  live  in  the 
home,  has  been  amended.  Federal  funds  may  not  be  withheld  when  aid  must  be 
denied  under  a  State  statute  because  of  home  conditions  when  adequate  care 
and  assistance  for  the  child  is  otherwise  provided  pursuant  to  a  State 
statute . 

Training  of  Public  Welfare  Personnel 

In  addition  to  the  provision  of  75  percent  Federal  financial  parti- 
cipation in  State  expenditures  for  training  of  public  welfare  staff,  the  new 
law  also  strengthens  sec.  705  of  the  Social  Security  Act  to  help  increase 
the  number  of  trained  welfare  personnel.  There  is  an  authorization  for  an 
appropriation  of  $3,500,000  for  the  fiscal  year  1963,  and  of  $5,000,000  for 
each  fiscal  year  thereafter. 

An  amount  as  determined  by  the  Secretary  not  In  excess  of  $1,000,000 
for  the  fiscal  year  1963  and  $2,000,000  each  fiscal  year  thereafter  is  avail- 
able to  provide  direct  training  for  State  and  local  agency  staff  and  to  pay 
the  cost  of  stipends  and  scholarships  of  persons  trained  iu  schools  of 
social  work  or  other  training  institutions  for  employment  in  public  welfare 
agencies.  The  remainder  of  the  appropriated  sums  will  be  allotted  to  the 
States  by  the  Secretary  on  the  basis  of  population,  and  the  relative  need 
for  trained  public  welfare  personnel. 

Like  previous  authorizations  for  funds  for  training,  the  implementa- 
tion of  this  section  is  dependent  upon  moneys  being  appropriated. 

Simplification  of  Categories 

Under  a  new  title,  title  XVI,  the  law  gives  the  States  an  option 
to  submit  a  single  State  plan  for  aid  to  the  aged,  blind,  and  disabled  and 
medical  assistance  for  the  aged.  Certain  States  having  a  separate  agency 
administering  aid  to  the  blind  are  permitted  to  retain  the  administration 
of  the  portion  of  the  approved  plan  that  relates  to  blind  individuals  under 
title  XVI  under  that  agency.  In  general,  the  plan  requirements.  Federal 
sharing,  and  other  provisions  now  in  the  separate  titles  are  incorporated 
in  the  new  title.  The  provisions  for  separate  and  additional  Federal 
financial  participation  for  medical  care  in  old-age  assistance  would  apply 
in  the  case  of  medical  care  for  all  recipients  of  aid  to  the  aged,  blind, 
or  disabled  under  the  new  title.  Combining  three  programs  into  a  single 
plan  permits  averaging  assistance  payments  for  the  aged,  blind,  and  disabled. 

A  State  electing  to  combine  its  programs  and  receive  payment  for 
expenditures  under  title  XVI  could  not  receive  pa3m>ent  for  expenditures 
under  titles  I,  X,  or  XIV  in  the  same  period  (with  certain  exceptions  to 
take  account  of  the  mechanics  of  terminating  the  old  programs). 


-  14  - 


Advisory  Council 

The  law  auChorlzes  the  appointnnent  of  an  advisory  council  to  review 
the  administration  of  the  public  assistance  and  child  welfare  programs. 
Twelve  persons  would  be  appointed  by  the  Secretary  in  1964  representative 
of  employers,  enployees.  State  or  Federal  agencies  concerned  with  adminis- 
tering or  financing  public  welfare  programs,  private  welfare  organizations, 
persons  with  special  knowledge  and  experience,  and  members  of  the  public. 
They  are  to  make  a  report  of  findings  and  recommendations  by  July  1,  1966. 
There  is  authorization  for  the  appointment  of  an  advisory  council  from  time 
to  time  thereafter. 

The  Secretary  is  also  authorized  to  appoint  advisory  conmittees  to 

advise  and  consult  with  him  in  carrying  out  any  of  his  functions  under  the 

Social  Security  Act.  A  report  shall  be  made  to  the  Congress  annvxally  on 

the  use  of  advisory  committees  and  the  membership  and  activities  of  each 
conmittee . 

Other  Provisions 

The  new  law  extends  for  two  years  the  authorization  made  in  1961 
for  a  temporary  program  of  assistance  to  United  States  citizens  returned 
from  foreign  countries  because  of  destitution,  illness,  or  other  emergency 
and  who  are  without  available  resources. 

Special  legislation  relating  to  aid  to  the  blind  enacted  in  1950 
authorized  for  a  temporary  period  the  approval  of  certain  State  plans  under 
title  X  which  did  not  meet  the  requirements  for  the  consideration  of  Income 
and  resources.   This  provision,  which  affects  only  a  few  States,  has  been 
extended  from  time  to  time.   The  new  law  amends  title  X  of  the  Social  Secu- 
rity Act  to  Incorporate  the  provisions  of  the  1950  legislation  on  a  permanent 
basis. 

4.  Maternal  and  Child  Health  and  Mental  Retardation  Planning  Amendments 
of  1963  —  P.L.  88-156. 

On  October  24,  1963,  President  Kennedy  signed  into  law  amendments  to 
the  Social  Security  Act  that  represent  one  of  two  major  pieces  of  legislation 
formulated  to  prevent  and  combat  mental  retardation  in  the  United  States. 
The  amendments  are  designed  to  carry  out,  over  the  next  several  years,  a 
number  of  the  recommendations  made  to  the  President  and  to  the  Nation  by  the 
President's  Panel  on  Mental  Retardation. 

Major  provisions  of  the  legislation;   The  amendments  contain  five  pro- 
visions. 

Planning  grants  to  the  States:   Authorizes  a  one-time  appropriation 
of  $2.2  million  for  grants  to  assist  the  States  to  plan  for  and  take  other 


15 


steps  leading  to  comprehensive  State  and  conmunity  action  to  combat  mental 
retardation.  These  grants  will  be  used  to  determine  what  action  is  needed 
to  combat  mental  retardation  in  a  State,  to  assess  the  resources  available, 
to  develop  public  awareness  of  the  problem,  and  to  coordinate  State  and 
local  activities  relating  to  prevention,  treatment,  and  amelioration.  The 
Federal  grant  (approximately  $40,000  per  State)  may  not  cover  more  than  75 
percent  of  the  cost  of  such  activities. 

Project  grants  for  maternal  and  infant  caret   Authorizes  a  new 
five-year  program  of  grants  to  public  health  agencies  for  projects  which 
would  provide  necessary  health  care  for  expectant  mothers  who  are  unlikely 
to  receive  such  care  either  because  they  are  from  families  with  low  income 
or  for  other  reasons.  Authorized  grants  total  $110  million--$5  million  in 
fiscal  year  1964,  $15  million  in  1965,  and  $30  million  each  for  fiscal  years 
1966-1968.   The  Federal  grant  may  not  exceed  75  percent  of  the  cost  of  any 
project. 

Increases  in  maternal  and  child  health  services;   Expansion  of  the 
existing  Federal-State  program  is  made  possible  by  raising  to  $50  million 
over  a  seven-year  period,  beginning  with  fiscal  year  1964,  the  present 
annual  ceiling  of  $25  million  on  Federal  funds. 

Increases  in  crippled  children's  services:   Similarly,  Federal  funds 
authorized  for  crippled  children's  services  will  be  increased,  over  a  seven- 
year  period,  from  the  present  $25  million  a  year  to  $50  million  for  fiscal 
year  1970  and  subsequent  years. 

Grants  for  research  relating  to  maternal  and  child  health  and 
crippled  children's  services:   Authorizes  up  to  $8  million  per  year  for 
grants,  contracts,  or  jointly  financed  cooperative  arrangement  for  research 
projects  related  to  maternal  and  child  health  and  crippled  children's 
services  that  show  promise  of  substantial  contribution  to  the  advancement 
of  these  programs. 

5.  Mental  Retardation  Facilities  and  Community  Mental  Health  Centers 
Construction  Act  of  1963  --  P.L.  88-164. 

President  Kennedy,  on  October  31,  1963,  approved  new  legislation  authori- 
zing appropriations  of  $329  million  over  a  five-year  period  to  provide  grants 
for:   (a)  construction  of  research  centers  and  facilities  related  to  mental 
retardation;  (b)  construction  and  establishment  of  community  mental  health 
centers;  and  (c)  training  of  teachers  of  handicapped  children.   (See  Table  I.) 

Summary  of  major  provisions 

Construction  of  research  centers  and  facilities  for  the  mentally 
retarded  (title  I);   Part  A  of  this  title  authorizes  project  grants  for  the 
construction  of  public  or  nonprofit  centers  for  research  that  would  develop 
new  knowledge  for  preventing  and  combating  mental  retardation. 


16  - 


g 


g 


r-> 

^v 

ft 

4J 

M 

e 

« 

0) 

•o 

u 

V 

M 

In 

V 

^ 

1 

^ 

V 

X 

cd 

;§ 

^ 

I-l 

« 

u 

o 

H 

00 

vO 

Ov 

t-l 

r*« 

\o 

s 


r*« 

%o 

CTn 

M  i-l 

h 

« 

y~^ 

(U 

U) 

►•   vO 

M 

vO 

10 

I-l  On 

1-1 

«  i-< 

^ 

U 

5 

Pi4  in 

<4-l 

vO 

o 

ON 

T-* 

m 

e 

o 

1-t 

<t 

■-I 

so 

1-1 

a> 

•M 

>-4 

in 


so 


in 


00  o 

vO  M 

Ov  O 

t-l  CO 


O 
vO 


O 

o 


en 

o 
en 


<n 


in 


1^ 

vO 


o 
en 


o 

in 


CO 

(M 

vO 
vO 

o 
«n 


<n 


o 

o 

• 

• 

o 

en 

in 

m 

r-4 

m 

•a 
c  -o 

3  0) 

C    O- 
J2  OS 

u 


o  o 


m 

NO 


in 

o 

o 

m 

• 

• 

• 

00 

vO 

o 

CM 

CM 

»-t 

r-l 

in 

o 

m 

O 

• 

• 

« 

• 

m 

00 

t~ 

g 

<M 

r-l 

O 

o 

o 

• 

• 

• 

f-t 

vO 

in 

o 
ml 


o  o 

•    • 

en  CM 


vO 
CM 


U 
O 

u 

PLI 


•o 

« 

o. 

• 

m 

e> 

u 

Cd 

CB 

0) 

u 

B 

4J 

•H 

O 

(3 

C 

"2 

•H 

o 

0) 

c 

U 

4J 

u 

5 

ss 

« 

JS 

4J 

•o 

CO 

4J 

C 

iM 

CO 

u 

4J 

1-1 

0 

o 

c 

(0 

ti 

« 

1-1 

o 

4J 

CO 

S 

0) 

iJ 

CO 

§ 

(U 

M 

^ 

as 

o 

V4 

CO 

od 

4J 

o 

CO 
4J 

1-1 

s 

<u 

C 

^ 

1-4 

c 

>^ 

C 

CO 

4J 

o 

CO 

•o 

ce 

0) 

4J 

/— s 

« 

/"s 

u 

CO 

CO 

M 

c 

4J 

O    ^-^ 

(fl 

1-1 

« 

Wi 

o 

e 

c 

v 

U 

CO 

c 

•< 

0) 

at 

o 

0) 

o 

H 

01 

j: 

•H 

U 

4J 

4J 

X 

u 

60  J= 

t-l 

a 

U    4J 

JJ 

V 

u 

0) 

Wi 

«k 

B 

u 

CO 

»J    M 

1-1 

> 

n 

u 

cd 

m 

M 

1-1 

IJ 

u 

•« 

<C    Q 

I-l 

1-1 

fu 

ca 

(U 

M 

W 

C 

CO 

o 

H 

0)   Pi 

(0  >^ 

1-1 
u 

s 

v-* 

4J 
CO 

\^ 

M 

H 

1-1 
CO 

CO 

H 

0) 

0) 

(8 

0) 

V 

u 

01 

"O 

1-1 

o^s 

Pb 

1-1 

i-< 

H 

oi 

c 

4J 

U 

4J 

CO 

•1-1 

H 

•H 

H 

iH 

u 
o 

17 


Part  B  authorizes  project  grants  to  assist  in  the  construction  of 
public  or  nonprofit  clinical  facilities  for  the  mentally  retarded,  associated 
with  a  college  or  university  which:   (1)  provide,  as  nearly  as  practicable, 
a  full  range  of  inpatient  and  outpatient  services;  (2)  aid  in  demonstrating 
provision  of  specialized  services  for  diagnosis,  treatment,  training,  or 
care;  and  (3)  aid  in  the  clinical  training  of  physicians  and  other  special- 
ized personnel  needed  for  research,  diagnosis,  treatment,  training,  or  care. 

Part  C  authorizes  formula  grants  to  the  States  for  the  construc- 
tion in  the  communities  of  public  and  other  nonprofit  facilities  for  the 
care  of  the  mentally  retarded.  Appropriations  will  be  allotted  among  the 
States  on  the  basis  of  population,  extent  of  need  for  facilities  for  the 
mentally  retarded,  and  financial  need,  with  a  minimum  of  $100,000  for  any 
State. 

Construction  of  community  mental  health  centers  (title  II);   Author- 
izes grants  to  the  States  for  the  construction  of  public  and  other  nonprofit 
conmunitv  mental  health  centers--facilities  providing  services  for  the  pre- 
vention or  diagnosis  of  mental  illness,  or  care  and  treatment  of  mentally 
ill  persons,  or  rehabilitation  of  persons  recovering  from  mental  illness. 
Grants  will  be  available  only  for  those  projects  for  construction  of  com- 
munity mental  health  centers  which,  alone  or  together  with  affiliated 
facilities,  will  provide  for  persons  in  the  community  and  nearby  at  least 
those  essential  elements  of  comprehensive  mental  health  services  which  are 
prescribed  by  the  Secretary  of  Health,  Education,  and  Welfare  in  accordance 
with  regulations. 

The  provisions  relating  to  allotments  among  the  States  and  to  the 
Federal  share  of  the  cost  of  projects  are  substantially  the  same  as  for 
construction  grants  for  community  mental  retardation  facilities  (Part  C  of  - 
Title  I). 

Training  of  teachers  of  mentally  retarded  and  other  handicapped 
children  (title  III);   Authorizes  grants  to  institutions  of  higher  learning 
and  to  State  educational  agencies  to  extend  and  strengthen  the  existing 
programs  for  training  teachers  of  mentally  retarded  children  and  deaf 
children  and  to  expand  these  programs  to  include  the  training  of  teachers 
of  all  handicapped  children,  including  the  visually  handicapped,  the  speech 
impaired,  the  emotionally  disturbed,  and  other  health  impaired  children. 

Title  III  also  authorizes  grants  to  States  and  to  public  and  non- 
profit private  educational  or  research  agencies  for  research  or  demonstration 
projects  relating  to  the  education  of  the  handicapped. 

6.  Vocational  Education  Act  of  1963  —  P.L.  88-210. 

On  December  18,  1963,  President  Johnson  signed  the  Vocational  Education 
Act  of  1963,  which  improved  and  expanded  programs  for  vocational  education, 


-  18  - 


extended  and  improved  certain  provisions  of  the  National  Defense  Education 
Act,  and  extended  for  two  years  the  Federally  Impacted  Area  educational 
assistance  program. 

The  Act  authorizes  a  new  permanent  program  with  appropriations  for 
State  vocational  education  programs  amounting  to  $60  million  for  fiscal 
year  196A,  $118.5  million  for  fiscal  year  1965,  $177.5  million  for  fiscal 
year  1966,  and  $225  million  for  subsequent  fiscal  years.   Funds  are  allotted 
among  the  States  on  the  basis  of  population  groups  and  a  per  capita  income 
factor.  The  new  fimds  may  be  expended  for  State  and  local  vocational  educa- 
tion programs  without  categorical  limitation  under  a  broadened  definition 
of  vocational  education  to  fit  individuals  for  gainful  employment,  embracing 
all  occupations,  including  business  and  office  occupations  not  now  covered 
under  existing  law. 

The  Act  authorizes  vocational  education  programs  for  persons  in  high 
school,  for  those  out  of  high  school  available  for  full-time  study,  for 
persons  who  are  unemployed  or  underemployed,  and  for  persons  who  have 
academic  or  socioecononic  handicaps  that  prevent  them  from  succeeding  In 
the  regular  vocational  education  program. 

Contributing  to  the  improvement  of  quality  in  vocational  education  pro- 
grams are  the  provisions  in  the  law  which  authorize  expenditure  of  funds  for 
teacher  training,  program  evaluation,  special  demonstration  or  experimental 
programs,  development  of  instructional  materials,  and  State  administration 
leadership. 

Ten  percent  of  each  year's  appropriation  would  be  reserved  for  grants 
by  the  Commissioner  of  Education  for  research  and  demonstration  projects 
in  vocational  education. 

In  addition  to  the  above  authorizations,  the  legislation  provides  for 
an  experimental  four-year  program  for  residential  vocational  education 
schools  and  payments  for  student  work-study  programs.   The  Commissioner  of 
Education  is  to  determine  the  use  of  funds  for  these  purposes;  it  is  under- 
stood that  one  residential  vocational  education  school  will  be  initiated 
for  the  benefit  of  residents  of  the  District  of  Colimbia.  Authorizations 
for  work-study  programs  and  residential  vocational  schools  are  $30  million 
in  fiscal  year  1965,  $50  million  in  fiscal  year  1966,  $35  million  for  fiscal 
year  1967,  and  $35  million  for  fiscal  year  1968. 

Matching  of  Federal  funds;   P.L.  88-210  requires  that  State  and 
local  expenditures  continue  at  the  current  level  of  support  for  vocational 
education  but  does  not  require  a  State  to  match  the  new  Federal  funds  for 
program  operation  in  fiscal  year  1964.   For  subsequent  fiscal  years  matching 
on  a  50-50  basis  is  required.   In  addition.  States  must  assure  that  Federal 
funds  complement  but  do  not  replace  local  and  State  funds. 


19  - 


Transfer  of  funds  to  assure  program  flexibility;   To  assure  that 
Federal  funds  may  be  used  in  the  State  and  local  vocational  education 
programs  to  meet  actual  manpower  needs  and  job  opportunities,  the  law 
authorizes  a  State  to  transfer  funds  allotted  under  George-Barden  and 
Smith-Hughes  from  one  category  to  another  or  to  any  occupational  training 
covered  by  the  new  authority.   In  such  cases  the  State  must  justify  such 
action  as  being  consistent  with  the  purposes  of  the  Vocational  Education 
Act  of  1963. 

The  law  eliminates  the  "farm  practice  requirement"  and  broadens 
the  definition  of  vocational  agriculture  in  the  Smith-Hughes  and  George- 
Barden  Acts  so  as  to  permit  Federal  funds  to  be  expended  in  agricultural 
training  programs  for  occupation  related  to  agriculture  in  which  a  knowledge 
and  skill  of  agricultural  subjects  are  involved.  Moreover,  home  econranics 
training  under  existing  law  is  now  limited  to  preparation  for  work  In  the 
home.   The  new  law  would  permit  the  use  of  George-Barden  and  Smith-Hughes 
money  in  the  home  economics  category  for  home  economics  training  not  directed 
to  home  activity  but  involving  homemaking  skills  for  which  there  were  employ- 
ment opportunities.   For  fiscal  year  1966  and  subsequently,  10  percent  of 
the  funds  now  authorized  under  Smith-Hughes  and  George-Barden  for  home 
economics  training  would  have  to  be  expended  by  the  State  for  training  which 
is  job  oriented  or,  in  the  alternative,  transferred  to  some  other  training 
program. 

Area  vocational  schools;   The  Act  would  permit  the  States  to  expend 
new  fimds  for  the  construction  of  area  school  facilities.  Although  matching 
of  Federal  funds  is  not  required  in  fiscal  year  1964,  Federal  funds  spent 
in  that  year  for  area  school  construction  purposes  would  be  matched  on  a 
50-50  basis.   Because  of  the  national  urgency  for  area  school  training 
opportunities  for  out-of-school  youths  and  adults,  the  report  further  re- 
quires that  at  least  33  1/3  percent  of  the  new  Federal  allotment  be  expended 
for  the  construction  of  such  facilities  or  for  the  cost  of  operating  programs 
of  instruction  for  this  type  of  student.   (Beginning  in  fiscal  year  1968, 
only  25  percent  of  Federal  allotments  need  be  used  for  the  purposes.) 

Periodic  analysis  of  training  in  relation  to  the  ^ob  markets: 
P.L.  88-210  requires  the  State  administering  agency  to  periodically  evaluate 
vocational  education  programs  In  the  light  of  "current  manpower  needs  and 
Job  opportunities."  The  new  law  establishes  an  Advisory  Conmittee  to  advise 
the  Commissioner  with  respect  to  policies  in  the  administration  of  the  voca- 
tional education  program  so  that  Independent  judgment  will  be  brought  to 
bear  upon  the  great  need  of  relating  the  program  to  actual  training  require- 
ments.  In  addition,  the  legislation  requires  the  Secretary  to  appoint  a 
National  Advisory  Council  during  1966  for  the  purpose  of  reviewing  the 
administering  of  the  vocational  education  programs  aided  with  Federal  fimds 
and  to  make  recommendations  regarding  their  improvement  for  transmission  to 
the  Congress  not  later  than  January  1,  1968.   This  coincides  with  the  time 
that  the  Federal  funds  reach  a  plateau.   The  legislation  requires  a  similar 
council  to  be  formed  by  the  Secretary  every  five  years  during  the  contlnxiation 
of  the  program. 

-  20  - 


\ 


Practical  nurse  training;   The  law  makes  the  practical  nurse  train- 
ing program  (Title  II  of  George-Barden  Act)  permanent  with  authorization  of 
$5  million  per  year.  The  area  technical  education  program,  authorized  by 
Title  VIII  of  the  National  Defense  Education  Act,  is  made  permanent  with 
the  present  $15  million  authorization. 

Part  B;   A  one-year  extension  of  the  National  Defense  Education 
Act  with  a  variety  of  relatively  minor  amendments. 

Part  C;   A  two  year  extension  of  Public  Laws  815  and  874,  provid- 
ing aid  for  education  in  Federally-impacted  areas. 

7.  Manpower  Development  and  Training  Act  Amendments  of  1963  --  P.L.  88-214. 

On  December  19,  1963,  President  Johnson  signed  the  MDTA  Amendments  of 
1963  which  extend  the  Act  for  an  additional  year  and  broaden  its  provisions. 

The  1963  Amendments; 

1)  Lower  the  age  of  youths  eligible  for  training  allowances  from 
19,  as  in  existing  act,  to  IJ.  The  17-year  olds  would  have  to  have  been 
out  of  school  at  least  a  year. 

2)  Permit  up  to  25  percent  of  the  persons  receiving  training 
allowances  to  be  youths  under  22  years  of  age.   (Present  law  limits  youth 
training  allowances  to  5  percent  of  the  total  training  allowances.)   Exclude 
youths  able  to  benefit  from  the  provisions  of  the  Vocational  Education  Act 
of  1963. 

3)  Put  off  until  F.Y,  1966  State  matching  requirements.   (Previous 
law  required  50-50  matching  to  begin  in  F.Y.  1965.)   The  amendments  require 
cne-third  matching  by  States  in  F.Y.  1966. 

4)  Add  20  weeks  of  allowances  to  trainees  who  are  taking  basic 
education  training.  Precise  determination  of  occupational  objectives  for 
these  trainees  need  not  be  made  before  educational  training  begins. 

5)  Permit  increases  in  the  weekly  training  allowance  to  $10  above 
the  State  unemployment  insurance  payment,  which  was  the  upper  limit.   This 
provision  is  designed  as  an  incentive  to  get  unemployed  workers  to  seek 
training  rather  than  draw  unemployment  pay. 

6)  Permit  trainees  to  work  up  to  20  hours  part-time  without  any 
loss  in  training  allowances. 

7)  Reduce  to  2   years  the  prior  work  experience  required  for 
trainees  to  be  eligible.   (Previous  law  required  3  years.) 


21  - 


8)  Permit  a  member  of  the  family,  where  the  head  is  unemployed, 
to  receive  a  training  allowance.  Only  one  person  In  the  family  group  is 
eligible  at  any  one  time.   (Previous  law  limited  training  allowances  to 
heads  of  households.) 

9)  Provide,  through  demonstration  projects,  grants  and/or  loans 
to  unemployed  workers  to  help  finance  their  relocation  expenses. 

10)  Title  I;   Extends  for  one  more  year  (through  F.Y.  1966)  present 
authorization  of  $3  million/fiscal  year  for  information,  evaluation,  and 
research  programs. 

Title  II:  Authorizes  $161  million  for  F.Y.  1964,  $407  million  for 
F.Y.  1965,  and  $281  million  for  F.Y.  1966  for  the  training  programs.  (Pre- 
vious law  authorized  $161  million  for  each  of  fiscal  years  1964  and  1965.) 

Title  III;   Extends  for  one  more  year  (through  F.Y.  1966)  present 
authorization  of  $1  million/fiscal  year  for  preparing  the  Secretaries' 
reports  and  other  miscellaneous  expenses. 

8.   Civil  Rights  Act  of  1964  —  P.L.  88-352. 

The  main  provisions  of  the  bill  are  designed  to  insure  equal  opportu- 
nity in  voting,  access  to  public  accommodations  and  public  facilities, 
education,  and  employment;  to  end  discrimination  in  Federally-assisted  pro- 
grams; to  create  a  Community  Relations  Service;  and  to  extend  the  life  and 
broaden  the  functions  of  the  Civil  Rights  Commission. 

Major  provisions  of  the  legislation 

Voting  rights:   Title  I  amends  the  existing  voting  rights  guaran- 
tees of  the  Civil  Rights  Acts  of  1957  and  1960.   It  is  aimed  directly  at 
practices  resulting  in  unequal  application  of  voter  registration  require- 
ments.  It  specifically  provides  that  registration  may  not  be  refused  by 
reason  of  immaterial  errors  or  omissions  in  application  forms;  literacy 
tests  may  be  used  to  determine  voter  qualification  only  if  they  are 
administered  in  writing  to  all  prospective  registrants,  and  if  copies  of 
the  test  and  an  Individual's  answers  are  available  to  him  upon  request. 
Sixth  grade  education  is  made  presumptive  evidence  of  literacy.  As  in  the 
case  of  the  other  titles  authorizing  the  Attorney  General  to  take  enforce- 
ment action,  there  are  provisions  for  expediting  litigation.  Including  the 
assignment  of  cases  to  a  three-judge  court  upon  request  of  the  Attorney 
General.   Unlike  the  other  titles  of  the  Act,  however.  Title  I  retains  the 
limited  criminal  contempt  provisions  of  the  earlier  Civil  Rights  Acts, 
giving  a  right  to  jury  trial  only  where  punishment  of  the  contempt  is  severe. 

In  the  other  titles  of  the  Act  there  is  emphasis  on  procedures  of 
conciliation  and  compromise,  and  upon  opportunity  for  local  action  prior  to 
Federal  enforcement.   But  in  dealing  with  the  basic  democratic  franchise. 
Title  I  places  emphasis  on  prompt  Federal  enforcement. 

-  22  - 


Public  accommodations;   Title  II  secures  to  all  persons  the  full 
and  equal  enjoyment  of  places  of  public  accommodation. 

As  the  proposed  Civil  Rights  legislation  moved  through  Congress, 
this  title  of  the  Act,  more  than  any  other,  took  on  symbolic  significance 
for  Civil  Rights  advocates.  The  denial  of  equal  access  to  places  of  public 
accommodation  had  been  first  and  foremost  a  grating  indignity.  Beyond  its 
moral  unacceptability,  discrimination  in  public  accommodations  has  been  a 
very  real  "brake"  on  the  development  of  the  Country's  human  and  economic 
resources.  Travel  and  investment  have  been  discouraged;  the  limitation  upon 
full  enjoyment  of  the  normal  incidents  of  American  society  and  culture  has 
been  one  cause  of  the  cultural  deprivation,  to  the  correction  of  which  so 
much  of  our  efforts  are  directed.  As  Secretary  Anthony  J.  Celebrezze  wrote 
in  his  August  9,  1963  letter  to  Senator  Warren  G.  Magnuson,  Chairman  of  the 
Senate  Committee  on  Comnerce: 

"...  The  knowledge  that  racial  barriers  are  being  removed 
from  public  accommodations,  education,  employment,  housing, 
and  in  numerous  other  areas  of  our  daily  life  will  provide  .  .  . 
strong  motivation  for  success.  Full  opportunity  will  spark 
ambition.  An  earnest  ongoing  effort  to  eliminate  all  forms 
of  racial  discrimination  by  both  public  and  private  action 
is  an  inseparable  part  of  the  proposed  program  to  combat  the 
illiteracy  and  inadeqtiate  skills  of  a  substantial  fraction  of 
our  populace. "--U.S.  Senate,  88th  Congress,  1st  session, 
Conmittee  on  Commerce,  Hearings  on  S.  1732,  p.  10. 

Providing  equal  access  to  public  accommodations  is  thus  a  necessary  corol- 
lary to  the  other  portions  of  the  Act  designed  to  provide  equal  opportuni- 
ties in  education  and  employment,  and  to  other  programs  in  welfare  and 
education.  There  can  be  no  achievement  without  aspiration,  and  there  will 
be  no  aspiration  without  genuine  opportunity,  including  full  acceptance  as 
a  member  of  the  public  without  regard  to  race,  color,  or  national  origin. 

The  concept  of  open  access  to  places  of  public  accommodation  is  not 
new  to  the  Anglo-American  legal  tradition.  For  many  centuries  the  English 
courts  have  held  that  innkeepers  and  blacksmiths  commit  their  property  to 
a  use  affected  with  the  public  interest;  and,  profiting  from  the  general 
comnerce,  must  make  their  goods  and  services  generally  available.   In  the 
United  States,  over  30  of  the  States  already  have  laws  prohibiting  discrim- 
ination in  public  accommodations. 

Places  of  public  acccwmodation  within  the  Act  are: 

Inns,  hotels,  motels  and  other  establishments  providing 
transient  lodging,  except  owner-occupied  boarding  houses 
offering  not  more  than  five  rooms  for  hire; 


23  - 


Restaurants,  cafeterias,  lunchrooms,  lunch  counters,  soda 
fountains,  and  other  facilities  principally  engaged  in 
selling  food  for  consumption  on  the  premises; 

Gasoline  stations; 

Motion  picture  houses,  theatres,  concert  halls,  sports 
arenas,  staditms,  and  other  places  of  exhibition  or  enter- 
tainment. 

All  such  establishments  are  covered  if  their  operations  "affect 
comnerce"  within  the  meaning  of  the  Act.   Inns,  hotels,  motels,  and  other 
places  of  lodging  are  deemed  to  affect  commerce;  eating  places  and  gasoline 
stations  affect  commerce  if  they  offer  to  serve  interstate  travelers,  or  if 
a  substantial  portion  of  the  products  they  sell  have  moved  in  interstate  com- 
merce; places  of  entertainment  and  exhibition  affect  commerce  if  they  custom- 
arily present  or  exhibit  entertainment  which  has  moved  in  interstate  commerce. 
Also  included  within  the  Act  are  establishments  which,  although  they  do  not 
themselves  affect  commerce,  are  located  in  and  offer  to  serve  patrons  of  an 
establishment  which  does  affect  conmerce;  for  example,  hotel  barber  or  beauty 
shops. 

Title  II  broadly  occupies  the  legislative  area,  rendering  ineffec- 
tual any  State  law  or  other  State  action  requiring  or  supporting  discrimina- 
tion. 

The  provisions  of  Title  II  may  be  enforced  by  an  injunction  suit 
brought  by  any  aggrieved  party,  in  which  the  Attorney  General  may  intervene. 
The  Attorney  General  may  also  Institute  such  suits  independently,  when  he 
has  reasonable  cause  to  believe  that  a  person  or  group  is  engaged  in  a  pattern 
or  practice  of  resistance  to  Title  II. 

Where  a  State  or  locality  has  a  law  prohibiting  discrimination  in 
public  accommodations,  thirty  days  notice  must  be  given  to  the  State  or 
local  officials  before  suit  may  be  brought.  When  suit  is  brought  in  a 
Federal  court,  if  the  court  believes  there  is  a  reasonable  possibility  of 
obtaining  voluntary  compliance,  the  natter  may  be  referred  by  the  court  to 
the  Community  Relations  Service  established  by  Title  X  for  conciliation  for 
a  period  of  not  more  than  120  days. 

Desegregation  of  Public  Facilities!   The  Supreme  Court  has  clearly 
and  frequently  decided  that  a  person  is  denied  equal  protection  of  the  laws 
within  the  meaning  of  the  14th  Amendment  when  a  State  denies  him  equal 
utilization  of  any  publicly  owned  or  operated  facility.   Notwithstanding 
many  court  decisions  applying  this  principle  to  a  variety  of  govemmentally- 
owned  or  operated  activities,  such  as  public  beaches,  golf  courses,  and  play- 
grounds, many  public  facilities  have  continued  to  be  operated  on  a  segregated 
basis. 


24  - 


Either  economic  circumstance  or  fear  of  reprisal  may  result  in 
an  individual's  being  unable  to  maintain  appropriate  legal  proceedings  to 
compel  the  desegregation  of  such  facilities.  Title  III  therefore  authorizes 
the  Attorney  General  to  initiate  proceedings  to  desegregate  public  facilities 
when  individuals  are  unable,  for  either  reason,  to  undertake  or  maintain 
proceedings  by  themselves. 

Title  III  authorizes  the  Attorney  General,  upon  the  written  com- 
plaint of  an  individual  that  he  is  being  denied  equal  utilization  of  a 
public  facility,  to  institute  legal  action  to  compel  desegregation  of  the 
facility,  if  the  complaint  is  meritorious  and  the  institution  of  the  action 
will  materially  further  orderly  desegregation  of  public  facilities. 

Desegregation  of  Public  Education:   Title  IV  has  two  main  purposes. 
First,  it  authorizes  the  Cotranissioner  of  Education  to  establish  training 
institutes  and  to  provide,  upon  application  by  local  school  authorities, 
technical  assistance  and  financial  aid  to  assist  in  dealing  with  problems 
incident  to  desegregation.   Second,  it  authorizes  the  Attorney  General  to 
institute  suits  seeking  desegregation  of  public  schools  where  the  students 
or  parents  involved  are  unable  to  bring  suit  and  where  such  a  suit  would 
materially  further  the  orderly  achievement  of  desegregation  in  public  educa- 
tion. 

In  the  long  interval  since  the  historic  decision  in  Brown  v.  Board 
of  Education  in  1954,  there  has  been  visible  resistance  to  desegregation  of 
public  education  in  many  areas.  But  it  is  clear  that  either  through  volun- 
tary compliance  or  by  court  order,  those  districts  which  have  not  yet  faced 
their  legal  responsibilities  must  desegregate.  The  provisions  of  Title  IV 
empowering  the  Commissioner  to  give  technical  and  financial  assistance  to 
school  districts  will,  in  the  words  of  Attorney  General  Robert  F.  Kennedy, 
"smooth  the  path  upon  which  the  Nation  was  set  by  the  Brown  decision." 

Title  IV  recognizes  the  hard  fact  that  "special  education  problems" 
exist  for  school  administrators,  teachers,  and  pupils  alike  when,  after  a 
long  history  of  segregation  in  public  education,  an  area  begins  the  process 
of  desegregation.   Special  educational  and  human  relations  problems  may 
arise,  for  example,  out  of  the  social  and  educational  backgrounds  of  pupils 
who  have  heretofore  attended  segregated  schools;  prior  lack  of  availability 
of  equal  educational  opportunities  to  Negroes  may  create  curricular,  grad- 
ing, classroom,  and  other  difficulties  in  racially  integrated  schools  serv- 
ing children  of  varied  scholastic  backgrounds.   Special  training  of  teachers 
and  other  school  personnel  may  enable  them  to  deal  more  effectively  with 
human  relations  problems  incident  to  desegregation. 

Title  IV  meets  the  need  to  provide  assistance  in  several  ways: 

Technical  assistance  may  be  furnished  by  the  Commissioner  of 
Education,  when  requested  by  local  authorities.  Assistance 


-  25  - 


in  the  preparation,  adoption,  and  implementation  of  plans 
for  desegregation  may  include  the  distribution  of  informa- 
tion regarding  special  educational  problems  incident  to 
desegregation,  and  making  personnel  of  the  Office  of 
Education  or  other  special  consultants  available  for  advice 
and  assistance  to  local  authorities. 

Training  Institutes  may  be  established  by  the  Commissioner 
of  Education  through  grants  or  contracts  with  institutions 
of  hi^er  education,  for  the  purpose  of  improving  the 
ability  of  teachers  and  other  elementary  and  secondary 
school  personnel  to  deal  effectively  with  special  educational 
problems  occasioned  by  school  desegregation.  Persons  attend- 
ing such  institutes  on  a  full-time  basis  may  receive  stipends 
and  travel  allowances. 

Grants  mav  be  made,  upon  application  of  a  school  board,  to 
pay  the  costs  of  giving  inservice  training  to  teachers  and 
other  school  personnel,  and  to  employ  specialists  to  advise 
school  personnel  in  problems  incident  to  desegregation. 
It  is  not  necessary  that  a  school  board  have  adopted  a 
formal  desegregation  plan  in  order  to  become  eligible  for 
technical  assistance.  Nor  is  assistance  restricted  to 
schools  desegregating  under  court  order.  The  function  of 
the  Commissioner  of  Education  is  purely  cooperative,  not 
coercive;  he  may  act  only  upon  the  request  of  local  school 
authorities. 

Title  IV  also  directs  the  Conmissioner  of  Education  to  conduct  a 
survey  concerning  the  lack  of  availability,  by  reason  of  race,  color  or 
national  origin,  of  equal  educational  opportunities  in  public  educational 
institutions  at  all  levels,  and  to  report,  within  two  years  to  the  President 
and  Congress.  It  is  the  purpose  of  this  provision  to  procure  complete  and 
accurate  information  concerning  segregation  and  other  factors  affecting 
eqiial  educational  opportunity. 

As  in  other  portions  of  the  Act,  the  provisions  authorizing  suit 
by  the  Attorney  General  emphasize  that  voluntary  compliance  will  be  sought 
prior  to  enforcement.  Before  the  Attorney  General  may  institute  a  school 
desegregation  suit  he  must  give  notice  to  the  local  school  authority  that  a 
complaint  has  been  made  to  him;  and,  upon  filing  suit,  he  must  certify  that 
he  is  satisfied  that  the  local  school  authority  has  had  reasonable  time  to 
adjust  the  conditions  complained  of.   Here,  as  in  Title  III,  enforcement  by 
public  suit  is  designed  to  ensure  that  neither  an  individual's  economic  cir- 
cumstances nor  his  fear  of  reprisal  will  prevent  the  law  from  being  given 
effect. 


-  26 


Equality  of  educational  opportunity  is  prerequisite  to  meaningful 
equality  of  opportunity  in  employment.   Disproportionate  unemployment  among 
nonwhites  is  unquestionably  related  to  the  fact  that  about  one-third  of 
the  3  million  adults  in  this  country  who  cannot  read  or  write  are  nonwhites; 
also  to  the  fact  that  25  percent  (or  2.3  million)  of  the  nonwhites  25  years 
of  age  or  older  did  not  complete  five  years  of  schooling  (compared  with  7 
percent  of  the  adult  white  population);  and  to  the  fact  that  almost  half 
of  the  adult  nonwhites  in  the  country  today  did  not  finish  grade  school 
(compared  with  about  20  percent  of  the  whites) .   The  greater  economic  oppor- 
tunities afforded  by  non-discriminatory  employment  practices,  (guaranteed 
by  Title  VII)  will  be  of  advantage  only  to  those  who,  by  reason  of  education 
and  training,  are  able  to  compete  for  jobs  offered  on  a  non-discriminatory 
basis.   The  long  range  effect  of  Titles  IV  and  VII  will  be  to  offer  meaning- 
ful equality  of  opportunity. 

Civil  Rights  Commission;   Title  V  extends  the  life  of  the  Civil 
Rights  Commission  for  three  years.   Since  its  creation  in  1957,  the  Commis- 
sion has  engaged  in  research  and  conducted  investigations  in  the  areas  of 
voting  rights,  and  denials  of  equal  opportunity  and  protection  in  housing, 
education,  employment,  and  the  administration  of  justice.   It  has  issued 
reports  and  recommendations  in  these  areas  which  have  shed  needed  light 
iipon  discriminatory  practices  and  denials  of  equal  protection.   Title  V 
gives  broader  definition  to  the  Commission's  duties  and  directs  it  to  sub- 
mit interim  and  final  reports  to  the  President  and  Congress  on:   investiga- 
tions of  alleged  denials  of  voting  rights;  studies  of  developments  in  law 
and  the  administration  of  justice  which  constitute  denials  of  equal  protec- 
tion; its  activities  as  a  national  clearinghouse  for  information  in  respect 
to  denial  of  equal  protection  in  various  fields,  including  voting,  housing, 
education,  employment,  the  use  of  public  facilities  and  transportation,  and 
the  administration  of  justice. 

Non-discrimination  in  Federally-Assisted  Programs;   Prior  to  the 
enactment  of  this  bill,  numerous  questions  of  statutory  interpretation  made 
it  uncertain  in  many  instances  whether  authority  existed  to  condition  Federal 
financial  assistance  upon  assurances  of  non-discrimination.   Some  statutes, 
such  as  the  Hill-Burton  Hospital  and  Medical  Facilities  Construction  and  the 
Morrill  Land-Grant  College  Acts  made  specific  provision  for  "separate  but 
equal"  facilities;  in  others,  the  statutory  provisions  were  thought  to  be  a 
mandate  to  extend  assistance  when  the  statutory  requirements  were  met,  even 
though  the  grantee  practiced  discrimination  In  administering  the  funds.   In 
some  areas,  however,  the  Department  of  Health,  Education,  and  Welfare  was 
able  to,  and  did,  condition  assistance  upon  assurances  of  non-discrimination. 

Title  VI  expresses  the  Congressional  Intention  that  "No  person  in 
the  United  States  shall,  on  the  ground  of  race,  color,  or  national  origin, 
be  excluded  from  participation  In,  be  denied  the  benefits  of,  or  be  subjected 
to  discrimination  under  any  program  or  activity  receiving  Federal  financial 
assistance."  As  such,  it  provides  a  clear  direction  that  all  activities 


27 


which  the  Department  aids  through  contract,  grant,  loan,  or  otherwise  must 
be  administered  on  a  non-discriminatory  basis  and  thereby  resolves  previous 
uncertainties  regarding  legal  authority  to  withhold  funds.   It  is  now  clear 
that  the  "simple  justice"  of  which  President  Kennedy  spoke  will  become  a 
reality — the  administration  of  Federally-assisted  programs  and  the  collection 
of  Federal  taxes  will  be  equally  color-blind. 

Title  VI  requires  each  Federal  department  and  agency  to  effectuate 
the  provisions  of  the  title  "by  issuing  rules,  regulations,  or  orders  of 
general  applicability,"  which  are  subject  to  Presidential  approval,  and  which 
must  be  consistent  with  the  objectives  of  the  statute  authorizing  the  finan- 
cial assistance.   The  title  is  to  be  given  effect  through  such  regulations, 
and  through  other  means  authorized  by  law. 

As  in  the  other  titles  of  the  Act,  the  emphasis  is  on  a  first 
attempt  at  voluntary  solution  of  problems.  No  agency  action  terminating  or 
refusing  assistance  may  be  taken  until  the  recipient  has  been  notified  that 
he  is  not  in  compliance  with  the  agency's  requirements,  and  it  has  then  been 
determined  that  voluntary  compliance  cannot  be  secured.   Following  such  a 
determination,  the  agency  must  give  an  opportunity  for  hearing  and  make  a 
finding  of  non-compliance  based  on  the  record.   No  agency  action  cutting  off 
funds  is  effective  until  30  days  after  the  appropriate  legislative  committees 
have  been  furnished  a  full  written  report  of  the  action.  Judicial  review  of 
agency  action  may  be  had  under  any  specific  provisions  included  in  any  statute 
authorizing  assistance,  or  under  the  Administrative  Procedure  Act. 

Equal  Employment  Opportunity;  Voting  rights,  education,  and  access 
to  public  accommodations  mean  little  on  an  empty  stomach,  and  with  empty 
pockets.  The  other  titles  of  the  Act  cannot  achieve  their  intended  effect, 
of  eliminating  race  from  American  life,  unless  all  Americans  are  afforded  a 
measure  of  economic  democracy;  it  would  do  no  good  to  raise  aspirations  and 
encourage  achievement  if  the  opportunity  to  secure  the  material  benefits  of 
our  abundant  society  were  not  made  equally  available  to  all. 

It  is  a  fact  that  nonwhites  have  represented  an  excessive  portion 
of  the  unemployed.  Not  only  has  the  unemployment  rate  been  higher  for  non- 
whites,  but  they  have  made  up  a  consistently  higher  percentage  of  long-term 
unemployed.   One-fourth  of  those  who  have  been  without  work  for  six  months 
or  longer  are  nonwhites,  but  nonwhites  constitute  only  one- tenth  of  the 
labor  force.   To  some  extent,  these  facts  result  from  lack  of  essential 
skills  and  education;  this,  in  turn,  has  often  been  due  to  inequality  of 
educational  opportunities.   But  over  and  above  this,  there  has  been  out- 
right discrimination  in  employment  practices. 

Title  VII  (which  takes  effect  July  2,  1965)  makes  discrimination 
in  employment,  referral  for  employment,  and  compensation  unlawful;  it  also 
forbids  exclusion  from  union  membership  and  apprenticeship  and  training 
programs  on  racial  grounds.   Initially,  the  Act  covers  only  employers  of 


-  28  - 


100  or  more  employees;  by  the  fourth  year,  employers  of  25  or  more  employees 
will  be  covered.  Employers  may  differentiate  between  employees  based  on 
bona  fide  merit  systems.  But  race,  color,  religion,  sex,  or  national  origin 
may  play  a  part  in  employment  only  where  they  are,  by  reason  of  the  occupa- 
tion, bona  fide  occupational  qualifications. 

Title  VII  creates  an  Equal  Employment  Opportunity  Commission,  to  be 
appointed  with  the  advice  and  consent  of  the  Senate.  While  the  Commission 
is  empowered  to  refer  matters  to  the  Attorney  General,  and  in  certain 
limited  situations  to  bring  suit  to  enforce  compliance  with  court  decrees 
already  made,  the  burden  of  its  functions  are  conciliatory.  The  Comnission 
may,  upon  request,  offer  its  services  to  assist  in  conciliation  of  problems 
arising  in  the  enforcement  of  this  Title.  It  may  also  conduct  appropriate 
technical  studies,  and  make  the  results  of  such  studies  public. 

Enforcement  in  the  courts  is  left  largely  to  private  individuals, 
except  where  a  pattern  or  practice  of  resistance  exists,  in  which  case  the 
Attorney  General  may  bring  suit.  As  in  other  titles  of  the  Act,  the  first 
opportunity  is  for  local  enforcement  where  a  State  has  a  fair  employment 
practices  law.  In  addition,  the  Commission  is  empowered  to  enter  agree- 
ments with  State  authorities,  giving  them  jurisdiction  over  particular 
classes  of  cases. 

The  President  is  directed  to  convene  conferences  immediately,  to 
acquaint  the  leaders  of  groups  whose  members  will  be  affected  by  the  Title 
with  its  provisions,  and  for  the  purpose  of  making  plans  for  fair  and  effec- 
tive administration  when  all  its  provisions  become  fully  effective. 

Registration  and  Voting  Statistics;   Title  VIII  directs  the 
Secretary  of  Conmerce  to  promptly  conduct  a  survey  to  compile  statistics 
on  registration  and  voting  in  geographic  areas  of  the  country  recommended 
by  the  Civil  Rights  Commission. 

Intervention  and  Removal;  Title  IX  provides  that  the  Attorney 
General  mav  intervene  in  cases  of  general  public  importance,  in  which  there 
is  an  alleged  denial  of  equal  protection  of  the  laws  under  the  14th  Amendment. 
It  also  governs  procedure  on  appeals  from  orders  remanding  cases  to  State 
courts  after  removal. 

Community  Relations  Service;  On  January  20,  1959,  then- Senator 
Lyndon  B.  Johnson  introduced  S.  499,  "A  Bill  to  establish  a  Community 
Relations  Service  to  provide  conciliation  assistance  in  communities  when 
disagreements  or  difficulties  among  citizens  are  disrupting,  or  are  threaten- 
ing to  disrupt,  the  peaceful  life  of  the  community."  The  Statement  of 
Purpose  of  that  bill  declared: 


-  29 


"The  use  of  force  In  any  manner  as  a  means  of  trying 
to  solve  these  disagreements  not  only  falls  to  produce 
satisfactory  solutions  but  also  tends  to  aggravate  the 
disagreements  and  to  create  new  problems.   Frequently 
the  citizens  who  are  Involved  in  or  affected  by  any  such 
disagreement  lack  a  satisfactory  means  of  communicating 
with  one  another  and  of  expressing  their  views  directly 
to  citizens  of  opposing  views.  As  a  result,  mutually 
satisfactory  solution  to  the  problems  caused  by  the  dis- 
agreement is  made  difficult,  and  some  times  impossible 
of  attainment." 

The  establishment  of  the  Conmunity  Relations  Service  as  a  concil- 
iating body  has  gained  life  in  Title  X  of  the  Civil  Rights  Act  of  1964. 
President  Johnson  emphasized  the  Importance  of  the  role  he  expects  the 
Service  to  play  by  naming  former  Florida  Governor  LeRoy  Collins  as  Director, 
on  the  same  day  the  bill  was  signed  into  law.   The  Service  may  offer  to 
conciliate  disputes  either  upon  its  own  motion  or  upon  the  request  of  an 
appropriate  State  or  local  official  whenever,  in  the  judgment  of  the  Service, 
"peaceful  relations  among  the  citizens  of  the  conmunity  Involved  are 
threatened." 

Jury  Trials;  Double  Jeopardy;   Title  XI  requires  trial  by  jury  of 
all  criminal  contempt  proceedings  under  Titles  II  through  VII  except  simimary 
punishment  for  contempts  committed  in  the  presence  of  the  court  or  so  near 
thereto  as  to  obstruct  the  administration  of  justice. 

The  title  also  provides  that  conviction  or  acquittal  of  a  specific 
crime  under  the  laws  of  the  United  States  shall  be  a  bar  to  criminal  con- 
tempt proceedings  under  the  Civil  Rights  Act  for  the  same  act  or  omission. 
Similarly,  prior  conviction  or  acquittal  in  a  criminal  contempt  proceeding 
under  the  Act  is  a  bar  to  future  criminal  proceedings  for  the  same  act  or 
omission. 

9.  Juvenile  Delinquency  and  Youth  Offenses  Control  Act  Extension  -- 
P.L.  88-368. 

On  July  9  President  Johnson  signed  Public  Law  88-368,  which  provided 
a  two  year  extension  of  the- Juvenile  Delinquency  and  Youth  Offenses  Control 
Act  (P.L.  88-274).   In  addition  to  authorizing  continuation  of  the  programs 
which  have  been  carried  out  under  the  original  enactment,  the  legislation 
calls  for  a  study  of  the  compulsory  school  attendance  and  child  labor  laws 
to  determine  their  effect  on  delinquency  and  youth  offenses.   It  also  makes 
provisions  for  the  development  and  carrying  out  of  a  National  Juvenile 
Delinquency  Demonstration  Project  in  the  Washington  Area. 


30  - 


Ma lor  provisions 

Continues  authorization  of  demonstration  and  evaluation 
projects,  training  of  personnel,  and  provision  of  technical 
assistance. 

Directs  the  Secretary  of  Health,  Education,  and  Welfare 
to  make  a  special  study  of  the  compulsory  school  attendance 
laws  and  of  the  laws  and  regulations  affecting  the  employ- 
ment of  minors  with  a  view  to  determining  the  effects  of 
such  laws  and  regulations  on  juvenile  delinquency  and  youth 
offenses.   Requires  the  Secretary  to  submit  an  interim 
report  on  the  results  of  the  study  to  the  appropriate  Con- 
gressional committees  by  June  30,  1965,  and  to  report  finally 
and  to  make  recoinnendatlons  for  legislative  or  executive  action 
by  January  31,  1966. 

Directs  the  Secretary  to  formulate  and  carry  out  a  special 
project  in  the  Washington,  D.  C.  metropolitan  area,  to 
demonstrate  the  effectiveness  of  a  large  scale,  well-rounded 
program  for  the  prevention  and  control  of  juvenile  delinquency 
and  youth  offenses.  The  project  is  to  include  guidance  and 
counseling  services  supplementary  to  those  provided  by  the 
public  school  system,  and  the  establishment  of  halfway  houses. 

Authorizes  an  appropriation  of  $10  million  for  the  fiscal  year 
1965  for  demonstration  and  training  programs  under  the  Act; 
and  authorizes  an  appropriation  of  $5  million  for  the  National 
Juvenile  Delinquency  Demonstration  Project. 

10.   The  Economic  Opportunity  Act  of  1964  —  P.L.  88-452. 

On  August  20,  1964,  President  Johnson  signed  into  law  the  "Economic 
Opportunity  Act  of  1964."  The  purpose  of  the  new  legislation  is  "to  mobilize 
the  human  and  financial  resources  of  the  Nation  to  combat  poverty  in  the 
United  States."  Recognizing  the  need  for  such  legislation,  the  President 
in  his  1964  State  of  the  Ifeion  Message,  had  said: 

"Unfortunately  many  Americans  live  on  the  outskirts 
of  hope--s<wie  because  of  their  poverty,  and  some  because  of 
their  color,  and  all  too  many  because  of  both.   Our  task  is 
to  help  replace  their  despair  with  opportunity. 

"This  administration  today  here  and  now  declares  uncondi- 
tional war  on  poverty  in  America.   I  urge  this  Congress  and 
all  Americans  to  join  with  me  in  that  effort. 


-  31  - 


"It  will  not  be  a  short  or  easy  8truggle--no  single  weapon 
or  strategy  will  suffice — but  we  shall  not  rest  until  that  war 
is  won.  The  richest  nation  on  earth  can  afford  to  win  it." 

The  enactment  of  this  legislation  brought  to  fruition  a  major  legis- 
lative effort  which  was  begun  in  January,  when,  in  his  State  of  the  Union 
Message  to  Congress,  President  Johnson  declared  an  "unconditional  war  on 
poverty  in  America."  The  President  gave  further  emphasis  to  this  objective 
in  his  budget  message  later  in  January,  and  the  legislative  proposals  con- 
stituting the  Economic  Opportunity  Act  were  made  in  a  Special  Message  to 
the  Congress  on  March  16.  After  hearings  and  extensive  debate  in  both 
houses,  the  bill  was  finally  sent  to  the  President  for  his  signature  on 
August  11th. 

The  Act  contains  seven  titles,  each  of  which  deals  with  a  particular 
aspect  of  the  poverty  problem  or  the  administrative  authority  to  carry  out 
the  Act.   The  Act  establishes  an  Office  of  Economic  Opportunity  in  the 
Executive  Office  of  the  President  with  responsibility  for  coordinating  the 
poverty- related  programs  of  all  Federal  agencies.  The  Office  of  Economic 
Opportunity  (OEO)  will  operate  a  Job  Corps,  a  program  for  Volunteers  in 
Service  to  America  (VISTA),  a  community  action  program,  and  special  programs 
for  migrant  workers.   In  addition,  the  OEO  will  distribute  ftmds  to  operate 
several  programs  authorized  under  the  Act  to  existing  agencies:   the  Depart- 
ment of  Labor  for  work-training  programs;  the  Department  of  Health,  Educa- 
tion, and  Welfare  for  work-study  programs,  adult  basic  education,  and  com- 
munity work  and  training  programs  for  welfare  recipients;  the  Department  of 
Agriculture  for  special  rural  antipoverty  programs;  and  the  Small  Business 
Administration  for  loans  to  small  business. 

Major  provisions 

A  total  of  $412.5  million  is  authorized  by  Title  I  for  three  youth 


programs. 


A  Job  Corps  is  to  be  established  to  provide  education, 
work  experience,  and  vocational  training  in  conservation 
camps  and  residential  training  centers. 

Work-training  programs  will  be  carried  out  under  agree- 
ments with  State  and  local  governments  or  non-profit 
organizations  to  pay  part  of  the  cost  of  full-  or  part- 
time  employment  to  enable  young  men  and  women,  16  to  21, 
to  continue  or  restmie  their  education  or  to  increase 
their  employability. 


-  32 


Work  study  programs  will  be  carried  out  under  agree- 
ments with  institutions  of  higher  learning  to  pay 
part  of  the  cost  of  part-time  employment  for  under- 
graduate or  graduate  students  from  low-income  families 
to  permit  them  to  enter  upon  or  continue  college  level 
education. 

Title  II  authorizes  $340  million  for  fiscal  1965  to  provide 
assistance  to  community  action  programs. 

Grants  will  be  made  to  pay  up  to  90  percent  of  the 
total  costs  of  financing  antipoverty  programs  planned 
and  carried  out  at  the  community  level. 

Grants  will  be  made  to  States  to  provide  basic  educa- 
tion and  literacy  training  to  adults. 

An  information  and  coordination  center  will  be 
established  to  encourage  voluntary  assistance  for 
deserving  and  needy  children. 

Title  III  authorizes  $35  million  for  programs  to  combat  poverty 
in  rural  areas. 

Loans  up  to  $2,500  may  be  made  to  very  low- income  rural 
families  where  such  loans  are  likely  to  produce  a 
permanent  increase  in  the  income  of  such  families.   The 
Director  of  GEO  also  may  make  loans  to  low-income  family 
cooperatives.  The  programs  will  be  administered  by  the 
Department  of  Agriculture. 

Assistance  is  to  be  extended  to  States  to  establish  and 
operate  housing,  sanitation,  education,  and  child-care 
programs  for  migrant  farm-workers  and  their  families. 

Indemnity  payments  are  authorized  to  be  made  to  farmers 
for  milk  which  had  to  be  removed  from  the  market  because 
of  pesticide  contamination. 

Title  IV  authorizes  the  GEO  to  make,  participate  in,  or  guarantee 
loans  to  a  small  business  firm  of  up  to  $25,000  on  more  liberal  terms  than 
is  possible  under  the  regular  loan  provisions  of  the  Small  Business  Act. 

Title  V  authorizes  the  Director  of  GEO  to  transfer  funds  ($150 
million  the  first  year)  to  the  Department  of  Health,  Education,  and  Welfare 
to  pay  costs  of  experimental,  pilot,  or  demonstration  projects  designed  to 
stimulate  the  adoption  by  the  States  of  programs  providing  constructive 
work  experience  or  training  for  unemployed  fathers  and  other  needy  persons. 


33 


Title  VI  authorizes  the  Director  of  OEO  to  recruit  and  train 
Volunteers  in  Service  to  America  (VISTA)  to  serve  in  specified  mental 
health,  migrant,  Indian,  and  other  Federally-related  programs  including 
the  Job  Corps,  as  well  as  in  State  and  community  antipoverty  programs. 

Title  VII  contains  provisions  relating  to  the  treatment  of  income 
received  under  Titles  I,  II,  and  III  of  this  Act  for  purposes  of  determin- 
ing eligibility  for  public  assistance. 

The  legislation  thus  contemplates  a  broad-based  attack  upon  the 
many  root  causes  of  poverty.   In  recent  years,  school  dropout  and  unem- 
ployment among  unskilled  youth  have  both  been  thought  to  be  causes  of 
juvenile  delinquency.   Through  the  youth  programs  of  Title  I,  the  Act  is 
designed  to  provide  them  vrork  experience  and  the  opportunity  for  continued 
education.   Economic  necessities  have  prevented  some  students  from  continu- 
ing their  education  at  higher  levels.   For  those  in  this  category,  the 
work-study  program  offers  a  means  of  obtaining  a  college  education  through 
part-time  employment  on  or  off  the  campus. 

The  Community  Action  programs  under  Title  II  seek  to  bring  to 
bear  the  full  resources  and  initiative  of  local  communities  to  combat  poverty. 
The  Federal  Government's  role  is  to  provide  counsel  and  help  when  requested, 
and  to  make  available  financial  assistance  in  meeting  the  costs  of  community 
programs.   Because  of  the  wide  variation  in  programs  which  can  be  expected 
to  result  from  differences  among  communities,  the  commtinitles  and  partici- 
pating local  organizations  will  have  a  maximum  of  flexibility  to  develop 
their  own  approaches.   It  is  expected  that  these  programs  will  be  conducted 
in  such  fields  as  employment.  Job  training  and  counseling,  health,  vocation- 
al rehabilitation,  housing,  home  management,  welfare,  special  remedial  and 
other  noncurricular  educational  assistance. 

The  adult  basic  education  program  of  Title  II  Is  designed  to 
stimulate  and  to  aid,  through  grants  to  States,  the  development  of  programs 
of  instruction  for  the  almost  11.5  million  adults  in  the  United  States  whose 
inability  to  read  and  write  or  to  perform  simple  arithmetic  makes  It  diffi- 
cult for  them  to  get  and  keep  jobs. 

Title  III  programs  are  specifically  directed  to  special  problems 
of  poverty  In  rural  areas.   The  farm  improvement  loan  program  seeks  to  give 
basic  financial  stability  to  an  estimated  500,000  farm  families  living  at 
poverty  levels  who  are  unable  to  obtain  credit  from  the  Farmers  Home 
Administration.   These  families  cannot  obtain  credit  from  normal  private 
sources,  and  they  are  so  poor  and  their  farming  operations  so  inadequate 
that  they  presently  have  no  debt-paying  ability  and  are  unable  to  satisfy 
the  eligibility  requirements  of  the  Farmers  Home  Administration.   Title  III 
also  provides  special  programs  of  assistance  to  migrant  farm-workers  and 
their  families.  Among  the  problems  affecting  this  group,  educational 


-  34 


deficiency  is  the  most  pressing.  The  average  farm-worker  over  25  has 
completed  only  6.5  years  of  school,  as  compared  to  11  years  of  school  for 
the  general  population.  Through  the  extreme  hardship  of  their  existence, 
the  migrants'  educational  handicap  is  usually  passed  on  to  their  children. 
By  means  of  loans,  loan  guarantees,  and  grants,  the  OEO  will  assist  States 
and  localities,  as  well  as  private  non-profit  organizations,  to  establish 
and  operate  programs  to  meet  the  special  needs  of  migrant  workers  and  their 
families  in  the  fields  of  housing,  sanitation,  education,  and  day  care  of 
children. 

The  small  business  loan  and  management  training  programs  to  be 
carried  out  under  Title  IV  by  the  Small  Business  Administration  will 
afford  opportunity  to  those  with  ability  and  initiative  to  enter,  or  to 
improve  their  position  in,  the  commercial  structure  as  entrepreneurs.  The 
operators  of  these  very  small  businesses  experience  problems  similar  to 
those  of  the  farm  families  assisted  under  Title  III — they  are  unable  to 
obtain  credit  from  normal  sources.  This  creates  instability  in  such  enter- 
prises, and  through  the  failure  of  these  businesses  restricts  needed  sources 
of  employment.  Fxmds  for  these  programs  will  be  provided  by  $25  million  of 
SBA's  regular  spending  authority. 

Title  V  provides  work  experience  programs  for  unemployed  fathers 
and  other  needy  persons.  The  Act  explicitly  provides  that  maximum  use 
shall  be  made  of  the  Manpower  Development  and  Training  Act  and  the  Vocational 
Education  Act.  Many  unemployed  persons  now  receiving  some  type  of  public 
assistance  are  so  lacking  in  knowledge  and  skills  because  of  prolonged 
unemployment  that  they  are  not  ready  for  training  programs  such  as  those 
offered  under  the  Manpower  Development  and  Training  Act.  Since  the  passage 
of  the  Public  Welfare  Amendments  of  1962,  States  have  been  able  to  establish 
community  work  and  training  programs  as  part  of  their  programs  of  aid  to 
families  with  dependent  children.  Title  V  would  expand  programs  designed 
to  help  unemployed  fathers  and  other  needy  persons  to  secure  and  retain 
employment  and  to  attain  the  capability  for  self-support  through  authorizing 
the  Director  of  the  OEO  to  transfer  $150  million  of  1965  funds  appropriated 
for  Title  V  to  the  Secretary  of  Health,  Education,  and  Welfare  to  make  pay- 
ments under  Section  1115  of  the  Social  Security  Act  for  experimental,  pilot, 
or  demonstration  projects  in  this  area. 

Voluntary  efforts  will  be  mobilized  through  the  creation  of  Volun- 
teers in  Service  to  America  (VISTA),  a  "domestic  Peace  Corps."  The  OEO 
will  recruit,  select,  and  train  individuals  who  volunteer  their  services 
for  a  period  (normally  one  year).  Once  trained,  voltmteers  may  be  referred, 
upon  the  request  of  a  State  or  local  government  agency,  or  a  non-profit 
organization,  to  perform  duties  in  furtherance  of  programs  combating  poverty 
at  the  State  or  local  level.  Or,  they  may  be  assigned  to  work  in  various 
activities  which  have  a  relation  to  the  responsibilities  of  the  Federal 
government . 


35 


Finally,  Title  VI  seeks  a  reasoned  and  coordinated  approach  to 
the  problems  of  poverty  through  several  provisions,  including  the  creation 
of  an  Economic  Opportunity  Council  made  up  of  the  Secretaries  of  Defense; 
Interior;  Agriculture;  Commerce;  Labor;  and  Health,  Education,  and  Welfare; 
the  Attorney  General,  and  other  officials.   There  is  also  created  a 
National  Advisory  Council,  to  be  appointed  by  the  President,  to  advise  the 
Director  of  the  OEO  in  carrying  out  the  Act. 

11.   Foster  Care  for  Dependent  Children  --  P.L.  88-641. 

On  October  13,  1964,  President  Johnson  signed  P.L.  88-641,  which 
extended  and  broadened  the  provisions  authorizing  Federal  participation 
in  payments  to  needy  families. 

Major  provisions 

Authority  for  Federal  matching  pajmients  for  children  placed 
in  non-profit  private  child-care  institutions  is  extended 
until  June  30,  1967. 

The  definition  of  "dependent  child"  is  broadened  to  include 
children  in  high  school,  or  vocational  or  technical  training 
programs  up  to  age  21. 

In  order  to  give  the  States  an  alternative  to  leaving  children  in 
unsuitable  homes  or  caring  for  them  elsewhere  without  Federal  participation 
in  the  costs,  the  Congress  in  1961  enacted  a  temporary  provision  for  Federal 
participation,  under  limited  circumstances,  in  the  cost  of  care  in  foster 
family  homes.   This  applied  to  children  who  had  been  receiving  aid  to 
dependent  children  but  who  had  been  removed  by  a  court  from  homes  found 
contrary  to  the  welfare  of  the  child. 

In  the  Public  Welfare  Amendments  of  1962  the  provision  for  Federal 
participation  in  the  cost  of  care  in  foster  family  homes  was  made  permanent 
and  the  Congress  extended  the  provision  to  include  care  in  non-profit  private 
child-care  institutions  so  that  whatever  facility  is  most  appropriate  for  a 
particular  child  may  be  used.   The  costs  authorized  to  be  paid  to  an  insti- 
tution were  for  the  same  items  as  if  a  child  were  in  the  foster  family  home 
of  an  individual.  Authorization  under  the  1962  Amendments  expired  Septem- 
ber 30,  1964,  and  is  extended  by  this  legislation  for  an  additional  33 
months . 

The  provision  broadening  the  age  limit  from  18  to  21  years  of  age 
is  in  recognition  of  the  fact  that  children  who  have  reached  18,  and  would 
be  ineligible  under  existing  law,  may  remain  dependent  while  they  are 
pursuing  an  educational  program.  As  noted  by  the  Senate  Report,  "the  .  .  . 
sharp  cutoff  at  age  18  may  have  the  effect  of  forcing  just  those  children 
to  leave  school  who  are  most  in  need  of  a  high  school  education  or  voca- 
tional training  if  they  are  to  become  self-sufficient  and  stay  off  the 
welfare  rolls." 


-  36  - 


12.  OASDI,  and  Other  Amendments  to  the  Social  Security  Act  and  the  Internal 
Revenue  Code  of  1954  —  P.L.  88-650. 

On  October  13,  1964,  President  Johnson  approved  P.L.  88-650,  which 

amended  Titles  II,  X,  and  XVI  of  the  Social  Security  Act;  and  Subtitle  A, 

Chapter  2,  and  Subtitle  C,  Chapters  21  and  23,  of  the  Internal  Revenue  Code 
of  1954. 

Major  provisions 

The  OASDI  program  is  amended  to  permit  a  disabled 
worker  to  establish  the  beginning  of  his  disability 
for  purposes  of  social  security  protection,  as  of 
the  date  when  he  files  his  application. 

The  Internal  Revenue  Code  of  1954  is  amended  to  extend 
through  April  15,  1965,  the  time  within  which  ministers 
(including  Christian  Science  practitioners)  can  elect 
to  be  covered  under  social  security. 

Earnings  of  certain  employees  of  local  soil  and  water 
conservation  districts  in  the  State  of  Oklahoma,  which 
were  erroneously  reported,  are  validated  for  social 
security  coverage  purposes. 

Payments  made  by  an  employer  to  a  newly-hired  employee 
for  reimbursement  of  moving  expenses  in  reporting  to 
his  place  of  employment  are  excluded  from  the  defini- 
tion of  wages  for  social  security  and  unemployment 
Insurance  purposes,  to  conform  with  the  income-tax 
withholding  procedures  authorized  by  the  Revenue  Act 
of  1964. 

Titles  X  and  XVI  of  the  Social  Security  Act  are  amended 
to  allow  the  States  at  their  option  to  extend  from  the 
present  12  months  to  a  maximum  of  36  months  the  period 
within  which  specified  amounts  shall  be  exempted  in 
determining  need  for  eligibility  under  aid  to  the  blind 
programs. 


-  37 


Legislation  in  the  89th  Congress,  January-April,  1965 

1.  Appalachian  Regional  Development  Act  of  1965  --  P.L,  89-4. 

President  Johnson,  in  signing  on  March  9,  1965,  the  Appalachian  Regional 
Development  Act  of  1964,  was  marking  the  culmination  of  consideration  of 
problems  of  Appalachia  by  two  sessions  of  Congress,  by  a  Presidential  com- 
mission, and  by  the  Conference  of  Appalachian  Governors.   The  Act  provides 
for  public  works  and  economic  development  programs  and  the  planning  and 
coordination  needed  to  assist  in  the  development  of  the  Appalachian  region. 

Major  Provisions  of  the  Legislation 

Creation  of  the  Appalachian  Regional  Commission!   The  Act  establishes 
an  Appalachian  Regional  Commission  consisting  of  the  Federal  Cochairman 
appointed  by  the  President  by  and  with  the  advice  and  consent  of  the  Senate 
and  one  member  from  each  participating  State.   The  States  involved  are 
Alabama,  Georgia,  Kentucky,  Maryland,  North  Carolina,  Ohio,  Pennsylvania, 
South  Carolina,  Tennessee,  Virginia,  and  West  Virginia.   The  law  also  pro- 
vides for  New  York  entry  into  the  program.   Commission  decisions  require 
the  vote  of  the  Federal  Cochairman  and  by  a  majority  of  the  State  repre- 
sentatives.  The  Commission  has  as  its  major  functions  the  development  of 
comprehensive  and  coordinated  plans  for  the  Region,  conducting  research, 
studies,  and  demonstration  projects  designed  to  foster  regional  productiv- 
ity and  growth,  reviewing  and  making  recommendations  on  public  and  private 
programs  in  the  areas,  and  encouraging  and  reviewing  the  activities  of  local 
development  districts  and  other  means  for  economic  growth  in  the  region. 

Special  Appalachian  Programs:   Title  II  of  the  Act  authorizes  funds 
for  an  Appalachian  Highway  System,  for  the  building  of  local  access  roads; 
for  the  construction,  equipping,  and  operation  of  multicounty  demonstration 
health  facilities;  for  a  program  of  land  stabilization,  conservation,  and 
erosion  control;  for  timber  development  organizations,  for  mining  area 
restoration,  and  for  a  water  resource  survey.   Increased  funds  are  made 
available  for  vocational  education  facilities,  for  sewage  treatment  works, 
and  for  supplementing  Federal  grants-in-aid  for  the  construction  and  equip- 
ping of  facilities. 

Local  Development  Districts!  Title  III  provides  for  support  for 
administrative  activities  of  local  development  districts  and  for  research 
and  demonstration  projects. 

Authorizations;   For  carrying  out  the  highway  program,  $840,000,000 
are  authorized.   For  other  activities  under  the  Act,  $252,400,000  are 
authorized  for  appropriation  in  fiscal  years  1966  and  1967,  to  be  available 
until  expended. 


-  38  - 


2.  Elementary  and  Secondary  Education  Act  of  1965  —  P.L.  89-10. 

On  April  11,  1965,  President  Johnson  signed  the  Elementary  and  Secondary 
Education  Act,  saying  that  he  believes  the  Act  "means  more  to  the  future  of 
America"  than  any  law  he  ever  will  sign. 

Major  Provisions  of  the  Legislation 

Grants  for  Education  of  Children  of  Low  Income  Families!  Title  I 
is  designed  to  encourage  and  support  the  establishment,  expansion,  and 
improvenent  of  special  programs,  including  the  construction  of  school  facil- 
ities where  needed,  to  meet  the  special  needs  of  educationally  deprived 
children  of  low-income  families.  Public  school  districts  would  be  eligible 
for  pa3ra»ents  for  programs  designed  to  meet  the  special  educational  needs  of 
children  in  school  attendance  areas  having  high  concentrations  of  dis- 
advantaged children.  In  these  areas,  the  school  district  would  design  special 
educational  services  and  arrangements,  including  those  in  which  all  children 
in  need  of  such  services  could  participate.  These  special  programs  include 
dual  enrollment  (shared  services)  arrangements,  educational  radio  and  tele- 
vision, mobile  educational  services  and  equipment,  remedial  education,  pre- 
school or  afterschool  programs,  additional  instructional  personnel,  equip- 
ment and  facilities,  and  others  judged  necessary  for  improving  the  education 
of  disadvantaged  children.  Local  educational  agencies  would  be  eligible  for 
payments  equal  to  one-half  the  average  per  pupil  expenditure  in  that  State 
multiplied  by  (a)  the  number  of  children  (aged  5-17)  in  families  having  an 
annual  inccsne  of  less  than  $2,000;  and  (b)  the  number  of  children  in  families 
receiving  payments  over  $2,000  under  the  program  of  Aid  to  Families  with 
Dependent  Children.  For  the  second  and  third  year  Congress  would  determine 
the  "low  income  factor."  Federal  funds  made  available  under  this  title 
would  be  used  essentially  for  improving  the  education  of  educationally  de- 
prived students.   States  and  local  educational  effort  must  be  maintained. 
Funding  for  fiscal  year  1966  is  approximately  $1.06  billion. 

School  Library  Resources.  Textbooks,  and  Other  Instructional 
Materials:  Title  II  provides  for  a  5-year  program  to  make  available  for 
the  use  of  school  children  school  library  resources  and  other  printed  and 
published  instructional  materials  including  textbooks.  A  State  plan  would 
provide  for  a  method  of  making  available  materials  for  the  use  of  all  school 
children  in  the  State.  Title  to  all  of  these  materials  and  control  and 
administration  of  their  use  would  be  vested  only  in  a  public  agency.  Mate- 
rials purchased  with  Federal  fimds  would,  when  made  available  for  use  of 
students  in  nonpublic  schools,  be  the  same  as  those  used  or  approved  for  use 
in  the  public  schools  of  the  State.  Fiscal  year  1966  funding  is  $100  million. 

Supplementairy  Educational  Centers  and  Services:  Title  III  estab- 
lishes a  5-year  program  to  provide  vitally  needed  educational  services  not 
available  in  sufficient  quantity  or  quality  in  elementary  and  secondary 


-  39 


schools  and  to  develop  and  establish  exemplary  elementary  and  secondary  school 
educational  programs  to  serve  as  models  for  regular  school  programs.   Special 
personnel,  equipment,  and  other  costly  educational  services  not  normally 
available  in  most  schools  would  be  made  available  in  centers  for  the  widest 
possible  participation  of  the  entire  community.   Funding  for  fiscal  year  1966 
is  $100  million. 

Educational  Research  and  Training;  Cooperative  Research  Act; 
Title  IV  authorizes  the  training  of  research  personnel  and  improved  dissemi- 
nation of  information  derived  from  educational  research  development.  Author- 
ity would  be  granted  to  utilize  the  research  competence  of  research  organiza- 
tions not  now  eligible  to  contribute  to  the  program,  such  as  private  non- 
collegiate  research  organizations  and  professional  associations.   In  addition, 
the  program  would  provide  for  the  construction  and  operation  of  research 
facilities  to  improve  the  quality  of  teaching  in  our  schools  and  for  the 
purchase  of  research  equipment.   Funding  in  1966  is  $45  million. 

Strengthening  State  Departments  of  Education:   Title  V  establishes 
a  5 -year  program  to  stimulate  and  assist  in  strengthening  the  leadership 
resources  of  State  educational  agencies.   The  State  educational  agency  would 
Identify  educational  needs  of  the  State  and  design  programs  to  meet  these 
needs.   Funding  in  fiscal  year  1966  is  $25  million. 

3.   Social  Security  Amendments  of  1965  —  H.R,  6675.* 

As  stated  in  the  report  of  the  Committee  on  Ways  and  Means  of  the  House 
of  Representatives,  the  overall  purpose  and  scope  of  the  Social  Security 
Amendments  of  1965  are: 

PURPOSE 

"The  overall  purpose  of  H.R,  6675  is  as  follows: 

"First,  to  provide  a  coordinated  approach  for  health  insurance 
and  medical  care  for  the  aged  under  the  Social  Security  Act  by  estab- 
lishing-- 

"(1)  A  basic  plan  providing  protection  against  the  costs  of 
hospital  and  related  care  financed  through  a  separate  payroll 
tax  and  separate  trust  fund; 

"(2)  A  voluntary  'supplementary'  plan  providing  payments 
for  physicians'  and  other  medical  and  health  services  financed 
through  small  monthly  premiums  by  individual  participants 
matched  equally  by  Federal  Government  revenue  contributions; 
and 

*  As  of  April  22,  1965,  this  had  not  been  enacted  into  law. 

-  40  - 


"(3)  A  greatly  expanded  medical  assistance  program  for  the 
needy  and  medically  needy  which  would  combine  all  the  vendor 
medical  provisions  for  the  aged,  blind,  disabled,  and  families 
with  dependent  children,  now  in  five  titles  of  the  Social 
Security  Act,  under  a  uniform  program  and  matching  formula  in 
a  single  new  title. 

"Second,  to  expand  the  services  for  maternal  and  child  health, 
crippled  children,  and  the  mentally  retarded,  and  to  establish  a 
5-year  program  of  'special  project  grants'  to  provide  comprehensive 
health  care  and  services  for  needy  children  of  school  age  or  preschool 
age. 

"Third,  to  revise  and  improve  the  benefit  and  coverage  provisions 
and  the  financing  structure  of  the  Federal  old-age,  survivors',  and 
disability  insurance  system  by-- 

"(1)   Increasing  benefits  by  7  percent  across  the  board 
with  a  $4  minlmimi  increase  for  a  worker  retiring  or  who  retired 
age  65  or  older; 

"(2)  Continuing  benefits  to  age  22  for  children  attending 
school; 

"(3)   Providing  actuarially  reduced  benefits  for  widows  at 
age  60; 

"(4)   Liberalizing  the  definition  and  waiting  period  for 
disability  Insurance  benefits; 

"(5)  Paying  benefits  on  a  transitional  basis  to  certain 
persons  currently  72  or  over  who  are  now  ineligible; 

"(6)   Increasing  the  amount  an  individual  is  permitted  to 
earn  without  losing  benefits; 

"(7)  Amending  the  coverage  provisions  by: 

(a)  Including  self-employed  physicians; 

(b)  Covering  cash  tips; 

(c)  Liberalizing  the  income  treatment  for  self- 
employed  farmers; 

(d)  Improving  certain  State  and  local  coverage 
provisions; 

(e)  Exempting  certain  religious  groups  opposed  to 
insurance; 


-  41 


"(8)  Revising  the  tax  schedule  and  the  earnings  base  so  as 
to  fully  finance  the  changes  made;  and 

"(9)  Making  other  miscellaneous  improvements. 

"Fourth,  to  improve  and  expand  the  public  assistance  programs  by-- 

"(1)  Increasing  the  Federal  matching  share  for  cash  payments 
for  the  needy  aged,  blind,  disabled,  and  families  with  dependent 
children; 

"(2)   Eliminating  limitations  on  Federal  participation  in 
public  assistance  to  aged  individuals  in  tuberculosis  and  mental 
disease  hospitals  under  certain  conditions; 

•'(3)  Affording  the  States  broader  latitude  in  disregarding 
certain  earnings  in  determining  need  for  aged  recipients  of 
public  assistance;  and 

"(4)  Making  other  improvements  in  the  public  assistance 
titles  of  the  Social  Security  Act. 

SCOPE 

"The  scope  of  the  protection  provided  is  broadly  as  follows: 

"Health  insurance  and  medical  care  for  the  needy 

"(1)   Basic  plan. --It  is  estimated  that  approximately  17 
million  insured  individuals  and  2  million  uninsured  would 
qualify  on  July  1,  1966. 

"(2)  Voluntary  Supplementary  plan. --It  is  estimated  that 
of  the  total  eligible  aged  of  19  million,  from  80  to  95  percent 
would  participate,  which  would  mean  approximately  15.2  to 
18  million  individuals  would  be  involved. 

"(3)  Medical  assistance  for  needy. --The  expanded  medical 
assistance  (Kerr-Mills)  program  is  estimated  to  provide  new 
or  increased  medical  assistance  to  about  8  million  needy 
persons  during  an  early  year  of  operation.   States  could, 
in  the  future,  provide  aid  to  as  many  as  twice  this  number 
who  need  help  with  medical  costs. 

"Old-age,  survivors,  and  disability  insurance 

"It  is  estimated  that  the  number  of  persons  affected  imme- 
diately by  changes  in  this  title  would  be  as  follows: 


-  42 


Provision 


Number  affected 


"7 -percent  benefit  increase  (  $A  minisium 
in  primary  benefit)—---— — - — ------ 

Child's  benefit  to  age  22  if  in  school-- 
Reduced  age  for  widows------------------ 

Reduction  in  eligibility  requirement 

for  certain  persons  aged  72  or  over--- 
Liberalization  of  disability  definition- 


"Fublic  assistance 


20  million  persons. 
295,000  children. 
185,000  widows. 

355,000  persons. 
155,000  workers  and 
dependents. 


"It  is  estimated  that  some  7.2  million  persons  will  be  eligible 
for  increased  cash  payments  under  the  Federal-State  matching  pro- 
grams. Moreover,  it  is  estimated  that  130,000  aged  persons  in 
mental  and  tuberculosis  hospitals  will  potentially  be  eligible  for 
pajmients  because  of  the  removal  of  the  exclusion  of  these  types  of 
institutions  from  matching  under  the  public  assistance  programs." 


43  - 


*  U.    S.    GOVERNMENT    PRINTING   OFFICE  :  1965  O  -  771-816 


1i